January 5, 2014

Anti-White Gang Leader Ordered to Pay $50,000 for His Part in Violent Threats that Shut-Down Pro-White Conference

On Thursday (Jan. 3, 2014) an Oklahoma court ordered Daryle Lamont Jenkins, the black leader of one of the more active anti-White "antifa" gangs, to pay $50,000 in restitution to David Yeagley for interfering with Yeagley's contract to speak at the pro-White American Renaissance Conference.

In 2010 Jenkins, Jeffrey Imm, and other anti-white gang members called a hotel, that was scheduled to host the conference, with threats of violence if they allowed it to take place. Law enforcement did nothing, so Yeagley, one of the scheduled speakers, decided to take matters into his own hands and sued both Jenkins and Imm in civil court.

Imm appears to have settled out of court, but Jenkins insisted on his right to intimidate Whites in an effort to silence their voices, and counted on the anti-White courts to side with him. Yeagley's lawyers, W. Dan Nelson and Joe Sibley, are clever and experienced and were able to ensure that didn't happen.

The lawsuit against Jenkins accomplished three valuable objectives for the pro-White cause, it:
  1. forced Jenkins to close the online forum he had been using to organize his violent, anti-White activities
  2. forced him to pay monies which he will no longer be able to use to further his group's activities, and
  3. sent a message to other anti-Whites -- hoping to use the same methods in silencing Whites who speak-out against anti-White injustice -- that they will have to pay a price.
Finally, I had a brief run-in with Jenkins back in 2011, when his group was involved in an effort to stop a group of Whites, organizing to protect the interests of their fellow Whites, from using the conference room at the Worcester (MA) Public Library.

I blogged that story for the pubic record, as it was happening. See the following links if you'd like to know more:

The Art of Suppression
The Art of Suppression, Part II
The Art of Suppression, Part III: The Good Guys Win

January 1, 2014

Free Software and White Resistance

The powers-that-be seek control over code. They aim to control our language (lingual code), our laws (legal code), our technology (source code), and, more recently, even our genome (biological code). Why they do so is a fascinating, but complex topic that is outside the scope of this blog, however, I would like to talk a little about the White Resistance Movement's use of Free Software, which offers the promise of breaking the regime's control over our technology, which is an important step in stopping White Genocide.

I administer a small number of websites -- some mainstream, others pro-White -- and I've noticed a trend over the years. The visitors to my pro-White sites tend to use Free Software far more often than those to the more mainstream sites that I administer. So I thought I'd look into this tendency a little.

According to Net Applications, a company that tracks technology trends, the overwhelming majority of desktop computer users are running some version of Microsoft Windows, with only two other operating systems registering at all: Mac OS X and Linux.

Here's their breakdown:

Windows:  90.71%
Mac OS X: 7.43%
Linux:       1.73%

I found the following operating system usage patterns for the White friendly websites I maintain:

Windows:  76.36%
Mac OS X: 12.85%
Linux:       10.80%

The interesting thing, here, is that White patriots are more than 6 times as likely to use the Free Software Linux operating system (technically "Linux" is the kernel and "GNU" is the operating system, but I'll go with popular convention) than the sheeple.

I was even more surprised by the browser breakdown. Internet Explorer usage is about even between the two camps, however, Firefox (the only truly free web browser on the list below) is tilted slightly in favor of the good guys. But the real surprise was in Chrome usage. The sheeple are more than twice as likely to use Google's Chrome browser than White Resisters.

StatCounter GlobalStats shows the following, in relation to web browser usage for mainstream web surfers:

Chrome:              40%
Internet Explorer: 28%
Firefox:                20%
Safari:                  9%
Opera:                 1%

Browser usage for visitors to my White pride sites, looks like this:

Chrome:              18%
Internet Explorer: 29%
Firefox:                27%
Safari:                  11%
Opera:                 3%

As noted above, Firefox is the only completely free browser on the list, and it is clearly favored by the resistance. Chrome and Safari are partly free, in that they both use the Free Software layout engine, Webkit. IE and Opera are, of course, completely proprietary.

If you want more info on how you can free your desktop from draconian proprietary software, let me know in the comments below and I'll point you in the right direction.