January 28, 2013

'Racism' Myth #7: Whites Are Uniquely Guilty of Genocide

The myth that Whites are uniquely guilty of genocide (and must be held accountable) was introduced by Cultural Marxists as part of their attempt to rob Whites of their confidence. The truth is that genocide is an even older profession than prostitution. It predates civilization. In fact, it is an evolutionary strategy utilized by (perhaps) all species. All peoples have practised it. Whites have been “genocided” far more often that they've done it to others.

The history (and prehistory) of the British Isles demonstrates just how common genocide is. The original Pictish inhabitants of the islands were invaded and nearly wiped-out by the Gaelics, who, in turn, were invaded by the Brythonic tribes. These Britons were subsequently partially “genocided” by the Romans, and completely wiped out by the Angles, Saxons, and Jutes. Who, of course, suffered genocide at the hands of the Danes and later the Normans.

The history of White genocide isn't limited to intra-racial incidents. Invading Mongols and Tartars destroyed entire tribes of Slavs and other Whites. More recently, Turks and other middle eastern groups have taken their turn at “genociding” White populations -- from the Iberian peninsula to the Russian steppe. The most recent example being the Judeo-Turkish genocide of the Armenians in the early part of the last century.

The claim that Whites are genocidal monsters usually refers to the history of the Americas. We're often told that, when Europeans arrived, there were 25 million American Indians in what is today the continental United States, and that 90% of them were exterminated. The truth is that the overwhelming majority of them died due to a lack of resistance to diseases like smallpox – not to an organized effort to destroy them.

It is true, however, that when Columbus arrived at Hispaniola, the Carib Indians were well on their way to exterminating the Arawaks. Europeans put a stop to it. Also, it's important to remember that the Indian tribes had a history of enslaving and “genociding” one another, long before Columbus.

Further, there's growing evidence that not only did the Mongoloid Amerindians slaughter one another, but that soon after arriving in the Americas, they exterminated the Solutrean peoples, that inhabited North America, as well as the Negroid/proto-Polynesian groups that lived in South America.

Also, it's important to note, that Whites are, by far, the most generous, magnanimous people. Through their creative genius and ingenuity they've contributed inestimably to the benefit of all the world's peoples. Plus, through myriad charities (not to mention the wealth redistribution programs imposed on Whites by the Cultural Marxist regimes that rule our nations) they've donated trillions to feed, house, and otherwise care for the bulk of this planet's non-White population.

January 26, 2013

White Power: White Domination of Strength Sports

I'm well aware of the controlled media's biases and their penchant for "disappearing" both the achievements of White men and any representation of authentic White masculinity. So, I'm never surprised by the endless crowing about "black athletic supremacy". Nor am I surprised when they promote those sports that blacks tend to do well in and ignore sports Whites dominate.

They bombard us with images of black athletic superiority. Their talking heads and other pundits reinforce that imagery with incessant cackling about how "athletic" this or that black athlete is. No matter how good a White athlete is, he is never called athletic; maybe gritty, or hardworking, or "old school," but never "athletic" or even "talented." No wonder most people think blacks are superior athletes.

That's why I was struck by the Whiteness of the 2012 World's Strongest Man competition while watching a replay of it on Youtube last weekend. That Whiteness was made even more striking by the fact that the event was recorded just outside Los Angeles -- in possibly the most "diverse" county in America -- yet all ten of the athletes in the final, were White. And that is just an extension of the racial reality of strength competition.

Year in and year out, over 90 percent of the World's Strongest Man competitors are White. And what's more, the few non-Whites who are invited to the competition for "diversity's" sake, routinely place in the bottom half of the competition. Usually dead last or very near it. This, of course, shows that they are really not qualified but are given the opportunity because of the event organizers anti-White desire to promote "diversity."

White domination extends to all other strength sports as well. In fact, White men dominate any athletic endeavor founded in strength. Since their inception, they have dominated power-lifting and Olympic weightlifting competitions. They tend to predominate in the "field" events of track & field, Olympic wrestling (both freestyle and Greco Roman), and are even over-represented in the offensive lines of the NFL. (A sport administratively controlled by Jews, that has a long history of anti-White discrimination.)

Media experts and other anti-Whites attempt to explain away White domination in strength sports with the usual canards that non-Whites don't do well in these areas because of poverty or a lack of opportunity. But that doesn't hold water.

Blacks like to say that they are "ghetto rich." Black kids have everything White kids have. They have the most expensive video gaming consoles, $200 sneakers, and many of them have enough "bling" to sink a battleship. Further, weightlifting equipment and gym memberships aren't that expensive (today, many gym memberships are $10 or less per month).

Because of the historic stigma in White culture against weight-training and the glorification of the physical in black culture and because black culture promotes the entertainment field (including sports) as a quick and easy way to get rich -- weight-training is much more popular in black communities. Percentage-wise there are far more black youths lifting weights than Whites. Also, as mentioned above, because of the dearth of qualified black strength-athletes and the politically driven desire of strength event organizers to include more non-Whites, it is Whites who find that their opportunities are increasingly curtailed.

The real reason for White success in strength sports is almost certainly genetic. They probably have more white -- or slow-twitch -- muscle fiber, which is responsible for strength. Just as blacks tend to predominate in sports where speed is emphasized because they have more red -- or fast-twitch -- muscle fiber.

Whites, particularly White athletes, need to speak-up against the ongoing discrimination and displacement of White men in sports.

January 24, 2013

Nationalism, the Solution to the Foremost Problem

Many wonder, if there is a foremost problem, then there must be a solution to it. What is that solution?

The solution to Jewish cultural hegemony is nationalism. Nationalism is the historical idea that states are at their most efficient and the citizens of said states enjoy the best balance of security, freedom, and wealth distribution when the population is based on a common language and culture. Historically, it has been the most common form of statehood. It's opposite is globalism. Globalism is closely associated with empire and is a form of government that is structured to benefit elites. Its causes and effects are always to steal wealth from the people and redistribute it to the elites. It is, by definition, multi-cultural.

A well-run society is the product of an optimum balance between the two competing desires of its population - the individuals' desire to be completely unrestrained, on the one hand, and their counter-balancing desire to be prosperous. Anarchy means no government and, in theory, is the perfect expression of freedom. Anarchy does not exist in nature but the closer a group comes to it the more impoverished they are. The foundation of prosperity lies in order and stability. So people consent to governance in order to create that foundation. But because those in government gain power from being in a position of power they become corrupt and seek more power. The end result of this search for power is total government or "totalitarianism."

Totalitarians then (or sometimes synchronously) seek to extend their power over others. Once they achieve a level of control over a society they use that society to dominate other societies. This leads to imperialism. Which extended to its fullest is world domination. This is the end goal of the Jewish Extremists and their collaborators.

Humans have a series of natural sub-groupings all with needs and desires specific to themselves that often overlap or conflict. The fundamental element of humanity is, obviously, the individual. Individuals form natural groups that extend through the following range:

  1. Family
  2. Clan (Extended Family)
  3. Tribe
  4. Nation
  5. Sub-Race
  6. Race
  7. Humanity

Each of these groups has natural advantages and disadvantages as to whether or not they are suitable for providing the building blocks of talent and energy that is necessary to create the balance that humans desire, without creating a system so large that the individual is incapable of recognizing himself. Historically, families, clans, and tribes have proven too small to provide the critical mass of talent and developed skill-sets to produce the highest level of prosperity. On the other hand, the sub-racial, racial, and species groupings have proven too large and unwieldy, which combined with an associated loss of identity and purpose in the individual, leads to difficulty in creating healthy, well-balanced societies. Only the "Nation" grouping allows for the best balance of talent, skill-sets, and identity that in turn allows for the best balance of governance and freedom.

After America's Founding Fathers attended to the problem of establishing a government for their fledgling federation, they turned to the problem of populating and growing it. They understood the idea of nationalism, expressed above, and were concerned with how to increase the population of the federation. They decided to experiment with the idea of a racial nation based on all of the natural characteristics of a typical ethnic nation (i.e. a common language, religion, political system, legal system, system of weights & measures, etc.). All of the accoutrements of a natural ethnic culture extended to the racial extreme. Toward this end, they passed the Immigration Act of 1790, which made non-White immigration into the Union, illegal. Thus was White Nationalism born. They never intended for this nation to be multi-racial or to have any religion other than Christianity (I do not profess to any religion), for they understood that attempting that would doom it. The experiment teetered and tottered for a while but ultimately proved to be successful. In fact, it got so bad that they had to pass another immigration act in 1924 to limit immigration to the percentages of the various ethnies that were already present in the country.

As mentioned, nationalist states are mono-cultural and mono-ethnic so Nationalism equates to Ethnic Nationalism. Because America is a nation of many ethnies, and those ethnies tend to coalesce into political groupings that are uber-ethnic, or racial, the normal desire for shared culture, traditions, folkways, and history becomes race based. Racial Nationalism evolved from this desire. All races in America, except Whites -- are not only allowed -- but encouraged, to form race-based (or other identity-based) political organizations. This leaves Whites at a tremendous disadvantage in a society that increasingly founds social policy on identity. White Nationalism is an organic movement to counter this disadvantage.

(NOTE: This entry is a revised reposting of an article I had originally posted a few years ago.)

January 23, 2013

What Happened to America?

In the middle of the 20th century, America was the envy of the world. A beacon of freedom, it was still rejoicing in its vibrant, post-war economy, its population had exploded due to the "baby boom," and its people were the freest in the world. It was a nation aware, and justifiably proud, of its accomplishments. It produced more than any other nation. It had large stable families in which men and women worked together to raise strong future adults. It had industrial and political leaders that took pride in their social responsibilities. It had the lowest crime rate in the world, with a correspondingly low incarceration rate. It had shining cities that were the jewels of the world. Its infrastructure was second-to-none. It had the best healthcare system, an honest government, low taxes, and a booming economy. Its people were rightly proud of it -- and loyal to it. What happened in the intervening half century?

Today, America's decaying inner-cities are cesspools of crime and blight. Black-on-White assault, muggings, robberies, home invasions, car-jackings, rapes, and murders are the norm. Graffiti and decay are everywhere. Elderly residents are afraid to venture out -- day or night. The poverty rate is rising even faster than the tax rate that overburdens America's working class. Diseases like tuberculosis, that had once been eradicated, have returned. New diseases like AIDS pop up semi-regularly. Ideas like civic duty, patriotism, and freedom are openly scorned. Its healthcare system is failed and its education system is corrupt -- focused on teaching "tolerance" and other socialist ideologies, rather than giving its students an education useful in the real world. Political and financial corruption are rife. Its economy is dying. Its good-paying, manufacturing jobs are off-shored and unfettered mass immigration allows hostile, third-world invaders in to take the service jobs that can't be sent overseas. Those invaders are then given social welfare largely unavailable to the average American and taught to resent White America. Ennui and civic indifference grow daily.

Attacks on constitutionally protected freedoms are frequent. Increased substance abuse (especially abuse of prescription medications) abounds. The institution of family is ridiculed and subverted. Every kind of sexual deviancy is advanced as normal. Everyone, including children, are encouraged to be as promiscuous as they like. At the same time abortion and birth control are heavily promoted leading to a dangerous decline in our birthrates. White American women are having 1.3 children per each - the replacement level is 2.1. Aggravating this problem is the fact that, increasing numbers of the children White women, are having, are non-White. White America is going extinct. This deplorable fact is frequently lauded by corporate and civic leaders alike. The media barrages us with hyper-sexual, near-pornographic images of ourselves and invariably portrays White men as weak, foolish, and inferior in every way to women and non-White males. And America is enmeshed in endless wars that in no way preserve or advance our interests.

How has this come about?

The answer, in a word, is "globalism" or the drive toward a one world empire and global governance. We are told that globalism is a natural result of advances in technology and human understanding and that it is desirable. The truth is, it is unnatural, unhealthy, and undesirable, in fact, it is absolutely destructive of freedom. And ultimately it is unsustainable. Our elites know this, but they still impose it on us. Why? To answer that we must understand the root cause of the problem.

The driving forces behind globalism are Jewish Supremacy, corporate greed; and class, racial, ethnic, religious, and gender antagonisms. The latter problems are creations and/or exacerbations of the first.

Every bad idea and every destructive movement of the last 150 years has been founded, designed, organized, and financed by Jews. In the rare cases when it wasn't founded by Jews it was founded by a homosexual, who was then promoted and financed by Jews. For instance, movements like:

Communism (Karl Marx, Jew)
Psycho-analysis (Sigmund Freud, Jew)
Trotskyism (Leon Trotsky, Jew)
Critical Analysis (Theodor Adorno, Walter Benjamin, Jews)
Cultural Anthropology (Franz Boas, Jew)
Marketing/Media Theory (Edward Bernays, Jew)
Liberal Economics (John Maynard Keynes, homosexual)
Homosexuality (Alfred Kinsey, homosexual)
Feminism (too many Jewesses to name)
The Sexual Revolution (Kinsey again)
The Counter-Culture Revolution (Allen Ginsberg, Abbie Hoffman, Jack Weinberger, Jews)
Neo-Conservatism (Leo Strauss, Irving Kristol, Jews)
Whiteness Studies (Noel Ignatiev, Jew)

were all founded by Jews or homosexuals and were all organized and funded by Jews, as well as being promoted heavily by the Jewish controlled media. The purpose of these movements was to provide the intellectual/philosophical foundation for the incessant attack on White America.

Trotskyism, marketing/propaganda, liberal economics, and neo-conservatism constitute the foundation of current economic theory taught in universities and business schools across the nation. They also provide the philosophical argument for the "open borders" policy that has led to the off-shoring of our manufacturing base, which is responsible for the out-of-control non-White immigration that is tearing at the fabric of our once largely homogeneous -- and thus stable -- society.

Feminism, the homosexual agenda, and the sexual revolution are largely responsible for the low birthrate of our people that is speeding us toward extinction. Fifty years ago, Whites were 33% of the world's population. Today we are 12% and declining rapidly. Estimates are that we will be 2-3% by the end of the century. If we can't get fair and honorable treatment from non-Whites in our own countries -- where we are still the majority -- how do you think we will fare under a global government when we represent less than 3% of the population? Further, the current policies that have led to our demographic decline are defined in Article 2d of UN Resolution 260 as "genocide."

Communism, Cultural Anthropology, and Whiteness Studies (as well as some of the movements mentioned in the preceding paragraphs) are the theoretical underpinnings of the racial, ethnic, and religious hatred directed at European-Americans. This has lead to a rise in fear, uncertainty, and doubt in the White population of the world and constitutes serious mental harm. (This is also defined as genocide under Article 2b of UN Resolution 260.)

Because Jewish Supremacy is very real and is the source of all the other problems facing White humanity, I borrow a phrase from Henry Ford (who was well aware of the Jewish Problem), and call this blog, "The Foremost Problem."

What can you do?

The good news is that there are simple, practical steps you can implement in your life to mitigate and/or eliminate the destructive influence of Jewish power. Just follow as many of these principles as you care to:

1.) Monitor what you consume. Because they have insinuated themselves into our society as its "middle men," Jewish Supremacists get a cut of almost everything you buy -- from the food you eat, to the clothes you wear, to the car you drive. Try to buy from Whites only (especially racially conscious Whites). Whenever possible try to buy from small mom-and-pops and even better from resale shops. Grow as much of your own food as you can, growing a garden is both healthy and fun.

2.) Cut your cable Don't allow the Jewish/homosexual propaganda that passes for entertainment, into your home. Don't watch Jewish (Hollywood) produced TV or films. Also, don't buy their books, newspapers, or magazines.

3.) Homeschool. If possible, homeschool your children, the public schools are cesspits of anti-White, misandristic perversion. Private schools are not significantly better.

4.) Behave morally. The Jewish Extremists promote sexual depravity, including promiscuity, because they believe it reduces resistance to their domination. They believe they can substitute sexual license for real freedoms. Develop a sense of purpose in life, find a spouse that will enable you to live a long, healthy, productive life with many children to help counter our demographic decline.

5.) Have lots of White babies. (Self explanatory.)

6.) Vote against incumbents. The Jewish radicals control our government through manipulation of public opinion using their control of the media and by buying our politicians. Voting against incumbents takes the latter away from them. There is, perhaps, not a single member of the US Congress (other than Ron Paul) who is not owned by the Jews or sufficiently cowed by them as to be rendered impotent in our struggle against them and none of them deserve to be re-elected.

7.) Spread the word. Talk to your family, friends, and associates about what you learn. Don't preach, cajole, or force the issue, but we must stop being afraid of foolish, meaningless words like racist and anti-semite. If we can't find the courage to overcome name-calling, how are we going to preserve a future for our children?

(NOTE: This entry is a revised reposting of an article I had originally posted a few years ago.)

January 13, 2013

Wes Welker and the Unbearable Whiteness of Being an NFL Receiver

It's no secret that the NFL discriminates against White athletes, particularly in the so-called "skill positions" -- like wide receiver. On any given Sunday, during the regular season, there are 64 starting wide receivers on NFL rosters. For the last week of the 2012 season, only eight of them were White -- all the rest, were black. This is particularly surprising considering that Whites outnumber blacks by a factor of six in this country.

It's also surprising seeing that, with the exception of speed, the skills (agility and hand-eye co-ordination) that constitute a good receiver are more prevalent in the White population. That Whites are more agile is well-known among football coaches and player personnel -- because it is tested for in the scouting combines. There are three tests: 20 yard shuttle, 60 yard shuttle, and the 3 cone drill that directly measure agility. The mean scores for Whites are significanly higher than for blacks, for all three tests. While there is no test for hand-eye co-ordination, that White receivers are superior in this category is borne-out week after week, when they consistently catch the ball at a much higher rate than their black counterparts. (White starting receivers catch 63.4% of the passes thrown their way, black starters catch only 57.1% of the passes targeted at them.)

This obvious discrimination makes Wes Welker something of an anomaly. Over the last six seasons (seasons in which he has been allowed to start consistently) he has, arguably, been the best receiver in the game. No one has caught more balls -- 672 -- over that time period. The next closest player is Brandon Marshall with 592. Welker has caught an average of 13 more passes, per season, than the next best guy.

Receptions, however, are not the best measure of receiving excellence. There are better stats that demonstrate excellence at the position: yards per target (or the number of yards a receiver gains per chance he is given to gain yards), yards after catch, and reception percentage. I prepared a simple table to compare elite receivers. Players were chosen if they had finished in the top ten, at least four of the last six seasons, in one of two categories: receptions and yardage. Seven wide-outs qualified. They are listed in order of reception totals.

Player
Recepts
Targets
REC%
Yards
YPT
Avg./Reception
W. Welker
672
925
72.6%
7459
8.1
11.1
B. Marshall
592
993
59.6%
7446
7.5
12.6
R. Wayne
578
935
61.8%
7589
8.1
13.1
R. White
563
953
59.1%
7773
8.2
13.8
L. Fitzgerald
534
954
56.0%
7278
7.6
13.6
A. Johnson
507
779
65.1%
7301
9.4
14.4
C. Johnson
488
882
55.3%
7836
8.9
16.1


Player
YAC
YAC/Reception
YAC/Yards
GP
GS
W. Welker
3848
5.73
51.6%
93
78
B. Marshall
2281
3.85
30.6%
92
90
R. White
2265
4.02
29.1%
96
92
L. Fitzgerald
1967
3.68
27.0%
95
94
A. Johnson
2192
4.32
30.0%
77
76
R. Wayne
2131
3.69
28.1%
96
95
C. Johnson
2366
4.85
30.2%
92
86

As you can see from the table, Andre Johnson leads the yards per target (YPT) category with 9.4 yards. Wes Welker is tied for fourth place with 8.1 YPT. But because YPT depends so heavily on how an offense uses a receiver (those in an offense that throws a lot of deep passes will benefit from that) it alone isn't sufficient to determine the best receiver.

The other two categories, because they are largely dependant on the receiver himself, are somewhat better measures of receiver greatness. And Welker dominates both categories. He dominates the group in reception percentage (REC%) at 72.6%, with A. Johnson the next best at 65.1% and Calvin Johnson bringing up the rear with a 55.3 REC%.

But where he really separates from the pack is in his ability to gain yards after he catches the ball. He averages 5.73 yards after each catch. The next best among the elite is C. Johnson at 4.85 YAC with Larry Fitzgerald only gaining 3.68 YAC. Even more telling is the fact that 51.6% of his total yardage is gained after he receives the ball. The average of the rest of this group is less than 29%.

Although, Welker is perhaps the best receiver in the league, it is highly unlikely he is the best White receiver in the land. He is simply a very talented player who has been given an opportunity to play at the position. There are 10's of thousands of White football players across the land. But few of them -- no matter how much better than their black competitors, they prove themselves to be on high school and college gridirons -- will ever be given an opportunity to start an NFL game. Why?

During the middle part of the last century, a Jew-dominated group of Cultural Marxists from the Frankfurt School made what they called a "long march through [our] institutions." In other words, they infiltrated all of America's institutions of power and took control of them (they call this "Entryism"). They did this so they could, as they say, "induce cultural pessimism in White males." In other words, they wanted to use their new found control over our culture to strip White men and boys of their confidence. A key strategy of this plan was to gain administrative control of the sports leagues and use that control to slowly replace White men with non-Whites, (particularly) blacks. We see this in every one of the major sports leagues with the exception of hockey. Blacks are not better athletes, they are simply being used as part of a larger strategy to destroy White America.

January 6, 2013

The 5 Most Important Nationalist Stories of 2012

Overall, 2012 was a neutral year for the White Nationalist Movement. We seemed to move sideways rather than forward or even backward. There was one positive development but mostly it was a case of "worse is better." This is my list of the five most important trends/events of the last year:

5. The Attenuation of the British National Party (BNP)
The BNP's momentum peaked in the spring of 2009 with the election of Nick Griffin and Andrew Brons to the European Parliament. Since then, a series of missteps by its leadership and the rise of pro-Zionist controlled-opposition groups -- the English Defence League (EDL) and the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) in particular -- have dissipated that energy and slowed the party's progress. For the immediate future, it remains to be seen if the EDL will be crippled by the arrest of its leader, Tommy Robinson, or strengthened by his martyrdom. On the other hand, UKIP seems to have the momentum behind it and it looks like 2013 will be a big year for that party.

As far as leadership mistakes go, all we can do is hope is that Nick and the gang get the ship righted in 2013.

4. The Abatement of the American Third Position (A3P)
The United States' American Third Position political party is experiencing doldrums similar to the BNP, albeit for different reasons. The group got off to a blazingly fast start in 2010 and, for a while, was the fastest growing political party in the US. Perhaps, because of its tremendous initial success, growth inevitably has slowed. Still, with limited resources they were able to mount campaigns (one presidential and one gubernatorial) that enabled them to grow their "mind share." Presidential candidate Merlin Miller was able to garner some exposure on national and international television and made a favorable impression on many White Americans, as well as others around the world.

The A3P has a talented and dedicated leadership headed by Chairman Bill Johnson and Executive Director Don Wassall. Look for good things from this group in 2013.

3. The Rise of the Golden Dawn in Greece
This is the only positive development for the year. A truly patriotic group seizing power, both on the streets and in the corridors of power, hasn't happened in Europe since 1933. The events leading to this advance -- the destruction of Greece's culture and economy -- are identical to happenings in the Weimar Republic and have been the cause of much suffering for the Greek people. Let's hope that the rest of the West can wake-up in time to prevent the worst of this suffering from happening to our peoples.

2. The Civil Rights Trial of North East White Pride
In March of 2010 five law-abiding members of North East White Pride were detained, illegally searched, and prevented from peaceably assembling in order to petition their government for redress of grievances. One of those members contacted the ACLU and, because the violations of his rights were so egregious, that organization agreed to sue several troopers and sergeants of the Massachusetts State police on his behalf.

The case, finally, went before a jury in October of 2012. It found for the defendants (the troopers) and set a clear precedent that Whites will not receive equal protection of the laws and where "civil rights' and Constitutional Rights conflict, the former will win out.

1. The Re-election of Barack Obama
Although most White Americans see the re-election of Barack Hussein Obama as the beginning of the end for White America, Nationalists see it as a case of "worse is better." We understand it is truly the beginning of the end for our enemies. History will show that this event was the watershed moment in which White America righted itself.

Traditionally, it has been very hard to make White America understand that the policies that have been implemented over the last century, or so, are deliberately designed to destroy us. The phrase most Whites (and others) use to show that everything is alright, is: "Well, there's a White man in the White House."

The psychological impact of a non-White in the White House has made it much easier for European-Americans to understand that we are not in control of our own destiny and that those who are in control are intentionally stripping us of our identity, robbing us of our traditions, denigrating our heritage, lying to our children about our history, and destroying our culture and way of life.