February 23, 2011

The Art of Suppression


White Americans are growing aware that something is very wrong in their country. They are slowly awakening to the fact that they have been robbed of their traditions, their past has been perverted, their culture and way of life is being destroyed, and that they, increasingly, are being denied basic rights and freedoms that are supposed to be protected by the US Constitution. Of these the freedom of speech - for White people - is being encroached upon daily. Yesterday, I had mine delayed.

I belong to a White rights advocacy group, North East White Pride (NEWP), that holds regular meetings around New England. NEWP is a staunch advocate of freedom of speech and we encourage dispossessed Whites to come and meet with us to discuss issues of concern to them and their possible solutions. Attendance is generally 5-25 people.

We have been meeting at the Worcester, MA public library since November, without incident, even given that the patrons of the library are almost completely non-White. In fact, the only Whites I have seen there are members of our group and library staff. This is the primary reason we chose Worcester as a meeting place - many White residents have visited our website and lodged complaints that the city they grew-up in, has become alien and hostile to them and that local authorities show no concern for their rights, traditions, and heritage.

When we originally decided to host meetings at the library we contacted the library staff to ascertain their position. We explained to them that we were a White advocacy group and they assured us that because the library was a publicly funded institution, our group had as much right as any other, to reserve one of their conference rooms. Yesterday was the first time, in four months of meeting there that we have had any problem.

At approximately 7pm on Monday night somebody named, Jared Going, posted a message to the forum of a powerful, well-funded, anti-White hate group known as One People's Project. Like many of these groups they masquerade as a "civil rights" organization and cloak themselves in a mantle of "concern," but in fact, they are virulently hostile to the interests of Whites and always seek to thwart any discussion of the issues that concern Whites, particularly of those issues of concern to heterosexual, White men of the working and middle classes. The message announced that we were holding a meeting at the library and that forum members should inundate the offices of the city manager and head librarian with calls and emails threatening "problems" if we are allowed to meet. (He has since added to the original post and it is increasingly clear that this group is eager to use violence to silence our voices. Hopefully, local law enforcement and the FBI [because this group is from out of state] will investigate.)

At 1:30pm the next afternoon I received a call from the head librarian, Mark Contois, in which he read me an email he had received from the city manager asking us to please reschedule the meeting because of "security concerns" of the city manager and chief of police. Their stated reason for concern was that a black pride group was meeting across the hall in another conference room. I said, that our discussion group certainly wasn't violent and asked if he felt their group was. He said he didn't believe so, but would I please consider rescheduling. As an act of good faith, I agreed to reschedule. (I should note that he also said that he was not asking them to reschedule, because they had reserved their room first. Fair enough.)

I have confidence that Mr. Contois, the city manager, and the police chief are acting in good faith, but I also know that the bigots at One People's Project and their powerful backers are going to make it very difficult for them to honor their oath to uphold the constitution. I'm not writing this entry to complain, but rather to illustrate how hard-left idealogues operate and to show that their operation would be impossible without funding and cooperation from immensely powerful vested interests in government, finance, media, and non-governmental organizations, like local synagogues.

Just prior to Mr. Contois's call I received the first of many from the local media. A reporter, Jackie Ries, with the Worcester Telegram, wanted to know if our meeting was connected to the local kidnapping, robbery, beating and racial humiliation of a young White kid by a 35 year old black bouncer that was currently making the rounds on Youtube. I told her I didn't know anything about that story and that our meeting had been scheduled weeks before. She asked a few more questions and hung-up. It was clear from her tone and attitude that she has a real problem with heterosexual, white men and nothing but contempt for the issues that concern them. This fact was borne-out by the mendacious article the Telegram published a few hours later - which not only got basic facts wrong (e.g. she [intentionally?] misidentifies the group as North East White Power) but completely misrepresented my statements. This is a common tactic of the mainstream media when reporting on issues of race, especially of partisan Jewish "reporters" like Ms. Reis. They believe that by smearing White advocates with the false label of "hater" they are justified in silencing our speech. We certainly are not "haters" and even if we were our speech is protected under the first amendment and our right to meet without the threat of violence is guaranteed by the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment.

A few hours after my talk with Mr. Contois, I received a call from someone identifying himself as, Rabbi Matt Berger of a local synagogue who said he was calling because "some of his congregants were concerned." I quickly assured him that his congregants had no cause for concern and that he and his congregants were more than welcome to attend our rescheduled meeting. I further assured him that we were eager to initiate a dialogue with the local Jewish community and to hear their ideas on how best to approach the problem of Jewish power and the devastation it was causing not only in White nations but in non-White nations like Palestine. He said he "did not want to dialogue" with me and ended the call.

As I said, within 5 hours of the start of the business day I received a call from the head librarian, asking me at the behest of the city manager to reschedule our meeting. Within a few hours of that I received multiple calls from the media and a local rabbi. How does the posting of some goofy, left-wing, (probably) drug-abusing college kid turn into a full-court press involving media, synagogues, and local public officials?

It couldn't happen without backing from the most powerful interests in our country. Who are these people? What is their aim? Why are they so determined to stop half-a-dozen Whites from talking about interests of concern to them in a public meeting place?

This is the real story that Ms. Reis and her cohorts should be reporting. Why isn't the media reporting on these thugs that are attempting to intimidate hard-working, tax-paying White Americans? Why aren't they investigating who their financial supporters and top organizers are? Why isn't law enforcement? After all, threatening violence is a crime and groups like One People's Project are clearly hate groups engaged in domestic terrorism. The final question is when are White people going to stand up to this abuse and hold our public officials accountable for allowing these violent hate groups to operate unchecked?

The Art of Suppression, Part II
The Art of Suppression, Part III: The Good Guys Win

(Editor's note: This group, in tandem with the black mayor pro tem of Charlotte, NC was also responsible for forcing the cancellation of another event, the American Renaissance Conference, attended by White rights advocates, meeting in that city two weeks ago. This is a crime that they have been committing - and getting away with, aided and abetted as they are by the powers-that-be - all over the country for years.)