Examining the causes, effects, and consequences of Jewish Cultural Hegemony
I suggest you make one about the term "human race".
new fossil evidence points towards multi-regionalism with the break away point of almost a million years ago for caucasians and africans. But caucasians and asians are much closer.
Bulldust,the so called markers in DNA are enviromenta,l in other words it says where your ancestors came from not what "race"! There are many many incidents all over the world of peoples dna results showing a certain race but when the individual is actually identified they are completely different race.How many people know Obama has maternal AND paternal european ancestry but only paternal african ancestry?Or Tiger Woods has more european AND asian ancestry but very little african on both sides? You are a "RACIALIST".
the so called markers in DNA are enviromenta,l in other words it says where your ancestors came from not what "race"!That's the standard anti-White, Cultural Marxist response. It confuses race with racial evolution.Evolution is the process of the environment acting on a sexually viable group. Races (sub-species) develop in relation to the environment the group lived in. So obviously, markers indicating race would also indicate the place that, that race developed.
Asians and Europeans also share Neanderthal dna. So that by default makes them something a bit different from homo sapien. Whether this was a adaptation that was needed to allow those first humans that migrated from Africa the ability to survive the bitter cold and vitamin d deficit is questionable. Just something to think about.
Post a Comment