July 16, 2009

Nationalism - The Solution to the Foremost Problem

Many wonder, if there is a foremost problem, then there must be a solution to it. What is that solution?

The solution to Jewish cultural hegemony is nationalism. Nationalism is the historical idea that states are at their most efficient and the citizens of said states enjoy the best balance of security, freedom, and wealth distribution when the population is based on a common language and culture. Nationalism is closely associated with Republicanism - or the right of the people to rule themselves. Historically, it has been the most common form of statehood. It's opposite is globalism. Globalism is closely associated with empire and is a form of government that is structured to benefit elites. Its causes and effects are always to steal wealth from the people and redistribute it to the elites. It is, by definition, multi-cultural.

A well-run society is the product of an optimum balance between the two competing desires of its population - the individuals' desire to be completely unrestrained, on the one hand, and their counter-balancing desire to be prosperous. Anarchy means no government and, in theory, is the perfect expression of freedom. Anarchy does not exist in nature but the closer a group comes to it the more impoverished they are. The foundation of prosperity lies in order and stability. So people consent to governance in order to create that foundation. But because those in government gain power from being in a position of power they become corrupt and seek more power. The end result of this search for power is total government or "totalitarianism."

Totalitarians then (or sometimes synchronously) seek to extend their power over others. Once they achieve a level of control over a society they use that society to dominate other societies. This leads to imperialism. Which extended to its fullest is world domination. This is the end goal of the Jewish Extremists and their collaborators.

Humans have a series of natural sub-groupings all with needs and desires specific to themselves that often overlap or conflict. The fundamental element of humanity is, obviously, the individual. Individuals form natural groups that extend through the following range:


  1. Family

  2. Clan (Extended Family)

  3. Tribe

  4. Nation

  5. Sub-Race

  6. Race

  7. Humanity



Each of these groups has natural advantages and disadvantages as to whether or not they are suitable for providing the building blocks of talent and energy that is necessary to create the balance that humans desire, without creating a system so large that the individual is incapable of recognizing himself. Historically, families, clans, and tribes have proven too small to provide the critical mass of talent and developed skill-sets to produce the highest level of prosperity. On the other hand, the sub-racial, racial, and species groupings have proven too large and unwieldy, which combined with an associated loss of identity and purpose in the individual, leads to difficulty in creating healthy, well-balanced societies. Only the "Nation" grouping allows for the best balance of talent, skill-sets, and identity that in turn allows for the best balance of governance and freedom.

After America's Founding Fathers attended to the problem of establishing a government for their fledgling federation, they turned to the problem of populating and growing it. They understood the idea of nationalism, expressed above, and were concerned with how to increase the population of the federation. They decided to experiment with the idea of a racial nation based on all of the natural characteristics of a typical ethnic nation (i.e. a common language, religion, political system, legal system, system of weights & measures, etc.). All of the accoutrements of a natural ethnic culture extended to the racial extreme. Toward this end, they passed the Immigration Act of 1790, which made non-White immigration into the Union, illegal. Thus was White Nationalism born. They never intended for this nation to be multi-racial or to have any religion other than Christianity (I do not profess to any religion), for they understood that attempting that would doom it. The experiment teetered and tottered for a while but ultimately proved to be successful. In fact, it got so bad that they had to pass another immigration act in 1924 to limit immigration to the percentages of the various ethnicities that were already present in the country.

As mentioned, nationalist states are monocultural and mono-ethnic so Nationalism equates to Ethnic Nationalism. Because America is a nation of many ethnicities, and those ethnicities tend to coalesce into political groupings that are uber-ethnic, or racial, the normal desire for shared culture, traditions, folkways, and history becomes race based. Racial Nationalism evolved from this desire. All races in America, except Whites - are not only allowed - but encouraged, to form raced-based political organizations. This leaves Whites at a tremendous disadvantage in a society that increasingly founds social policy on racial identity. White Nationalism is an organic movement to counter this disadvantage.

12 comments:

The Thinking Nationalist said...

Russell:

You totally GET IT. The solution to our problems is to abandon Neo-Marxist Globalism and replace it with a firm "America First" Nationalism.

You make a compelling case that that Nationalism needs to be "White ethno-nationalism".

However, this overlooks several "tribal" divisions within the White race itself.

Traditional white Nationalism also embraces an America-centric fundamentalist Christianity, which excludes many White nationalities
who profess creeds such as Catholicism, Lutheranism, and Orthodox Christianity, or even Paganism.

As a general rule, American white Nationalists have been slow to
embrace adherents of these faiths as truly "White". This is a huge mistake, IMHO.

We will do ourselves no good if we fight religious doctrine wars among ourselves while the Secular Jew continues to rule us.

What we must do put these differences among us aside, enlist the assistance of such other American ethnic groups as may be disposed to assist us, and do TWO things:

First, take back our economy from the Globalists, and Second, turn back the Non-White, Non-English speaking INVASION coming from South of our border and prevent all further immigration that is not either highly skilled (Chinese and other Asian, and strictly limited in numbers)or White European, White Australian, or White South African.

This is America - not North Mexico.

Russell A. James said...

TNN:

I was listening to Dr. Tom Sunic on his radio program over at Voice of Reason Radio, and he made a compelling case for calling what I describe as White (or racial) Nationalism - Racialism. He opined that the term "Nationalism" defines the cultural expression of an ethnic group and not a race.

"First, take back our economy from the Globalists, and Second, turn back the Non-White, Non-English speaking INVASION coming from South of our border and prevent all further immigration"

I agree the first one is the bigger problem, but I think we need to solve the illegal invasion first, or we will never be able to solve the economic problem through peaceful, political means.

Luis Magno said...

I would suggest the name ethno-racialism.

Anonymous said...

"The solution to Jewish cultural hegemony is nationalism."

That's the ticket exactly. It's amazing to me to hear people I know discussing how this country is going to hell in a hand basket yet they are totally clueless how to rectify it. Americans just don't think anymore. They watch TV instead.

Paul

Russell A. James said...

"Americans just don't think anymore. They watch TV instead.

:)

No one should have cable TV or, lord forbid, allow a child anywhere near the poisonous propaganda it spews.

Anonymous said...

"First, take back our economy from the Globalists, and Second, turn back the Non-White, Non-English speaking INVASION coming from South of our border and prevent all further immigration"

I don't know where this quote comes from but by excluding Spanish-speaking Latin Americans of European descent we are shooting ourselves in the foot. Fully one-third of all Latin Americans are of exclusively European descent.

Anonymous said...

"'The solution to Jewish cultural hegemony is nationalism.'

That's the ticket exactly. It's amazing to me to hear people I know discussing how this country is going to hell in a hand basket yet they are totally clueless how to rectify it. Americans just don't think anymore. They watch TV instead."

What is nationalism? Racialism? So far both are total failures.

Anonymous said...

Russel's "nationalism" means what? Deporting all non-whites? Carving out geographical parts of the country or entire states and seceding? What is "nationalism"? If it is racial separatism how practical or possible is it?

Russell A. James said...

Anon,

"I don't know where this quote comes from but by excluding Spanish-speaking Latin Americans of European descent we are shooting ourselves in the foot. Fully one-third of all Latin Americans are of exclusively European descent."

Less than 3% of Latin America is of pure European lineage. The rest are of largely meso-American Indian descent or mixed ancestry.

Those who are White tend to be the upper-class and are not immigrating to America. Those coming here are almost exclusively of the non-White variety.

Russell A. James said...

"If it is racial separatism how practical or possible is it?"

It is both very practical and very simple. Simply enforce the law of this land and it will be unsuitable to those coming here so they will stop coming. Most of those, here illegally will leave immediately and the rest can be assisted to leave over-time.

If we applied ourselves 75% of the non-White population could be re-populated to their countries of origin in less than 20 years, possibly less than 10. The alternative is simply unacceptable. Whites will be swept away and essentially "genocided" in that same time period.

Look at it this way, in 1960 the population of the US was approximately 180 million, with 10% or 18 million being non-White.

Now there are roughly 105 million non-Whites here, most of that coming from immigration. Lets say 80 million of it is from immigration. If the third world can export 80 million into our country in a half-century we can certainly export them back. I would bet in less than 1/3 that time.

Jaedda Felagund said...

I prefer the term 'White Nationalism' my self and that is due to the fact that academics (Carol Swain, Leonard Zeskind) are already using this term to describe these types of beliefs/ ideology.

As far as moving populations of Non-Whites, it is VERY FEASIBLE.

Millions of German Civilians were expulsed from Poland at the end of WW 2.

Millions of Palestinians were expulsed by Zionists in 1948.

Stalin seemed to make a game of moving different ethnic groups around in the Soviet Union.

The notion that populations can not be moved around in large times is a myth created by Leftists/ Liberals to discourage us. Everything that has been changed can be reverted back to! It is possible. White America here we come!!!

Russell A. James said...

Jaedda,

"moving populations of Non-Whites, it is VERY FEASIBLE. "

It really is. I believe if we simply enforce the law most of them will "self deport." And I'm not just talking about the illegals. A part of "enforcing the law" would mean to stop taxing Whites to subsidize non-Whites. If they weren't subsidized they wouldn't come and many would probably choose to leave.