The Foremost Problem

The Art of Suppression - Part III: The Good Guys Win

2011-09-15T14:25:00.014-04:00

It has been a long dark (pun intended) night for White folks, world-wide. Our countries have been flooded-with alien non-Whites (who, as soon as they land on our shores, are taught hatred and contempt for us - not to mention how to game the system), we are taught lies about our history, our women are taught to hate White men, and our children are taught contempt for their parents and all those who came before. Fortunately, a small but important victory for White rights was achieved recently at the Worcester Public Library (WPL).

North East White Pride (NEWP) a regional White rights and advocacy group, active around New England, was holding meetings at the WPL when they were viciously attacked by an extremist hate group, that calls itself the Revolutionary Communist Progressive Labor Party (PLP). (For more on that, see Parts I & II of this series.)

Their assault on NEWP members peacefully assembled in one of the library's conference rooms culminated in NEWP (yes, the victims of the attack) being suspended from using the library's conference rooms. NEWP sought legal help from a number of local attorneys - all of whom refused to take the case. We were forced to turn to the ACLU for help and they determined that our rights absolutely were violated and offered their services.

After receiving a letter from the ACLU, the library board decided to hold a series of public meetings to determine if changes should be made in library policy concerning the reservation of conference rooms. It was clear the library was going to implement policies that would make it impossible for Politically Incorrect groups (i.e. groups seeking to protect the rights of Whites or of men) to meet at the library.

NEWP members attended to defend the rights of Whites in central Massachusetts (and to set a precedent for pro-White advocates everywhere) to use the WPL's conference rooms. Anti-White agitators also showed in an effort to limit the rights of Whites. The library committee tasked with hearing the arguments ultimately decided in favor of justice (for once) and voted to recommend to the full board that library policy not be changed. The full board concurred and White Rights Advocates will still be allowed to reserve rooms at the WPL.

I'm happy to report that several members of the board and staff of the library privately assured us that they were 100% behind our right to freedom of speech and they, personally, were growing aware that something is very wrong in America when violent groups of Jewish agitators can commit hate crimes against Whites - peaceably assembled in an effort to petition their government for redress of grievances - and not be arrested.

I'm also happy to report that because of the publicity the attacks created for our group we gained several new local members. We originally started holding the meetings at the WPL because residents of the area have repeatedly contacted us asking if we would organize in that area. Their is much concern on the part of White Worcester residents that their beloved city is moving in the wrong direction with racial-flooding absolutely destroying the White community, culture, and way of life of the region.

The Art of Suppression -- Part II

2011-07-17T19:30:00.026-04:00

(In an effort to hold our public officials accountable, we are trying to raise awareness of this issue throughout the pro-White community and beyond. Please link this to every forum, social network, or website you think might be useful. If you are a blogger, please consider republishing this on your blog. Thank you in advance - Ed.)

As many of you are aware, North East White Pride (NEWP) has been meeting at the Worcester Public Library (WPL) since November 2010. We met there, without incident, for four months, until a local, anti-White, hate group, calling itself the Revolutionary Communist Progressive Labor Party (PLP), learned about our meetings. They organized a campaign of intimidation that cowed the City Manager into ordering head librarian, Mark Contois, to call and ask us to reschedule our February meeting. If you'd like to know more about that part of this ongoing saga, please see Part I of this story.

As an act of good faith, we agreed to reschedule. The library's scheduling agent, Denise McGinley, in violation of our civil rights, dragged her heels and gave us the run-around for three months. We were finally able to secure a time slot for our rescheduled February meeting on May 21. Prior to the Communist hate group meddling in our affairs, we had no problems scheduling meetings.

On the 21st, four NEWP members gathered in the room we had reserved and after about 10 minutes three new faces arrived. It was pretty clear that they were anti-Whites, but the meeting was open to all and we were eager to talk with those that opposed us, because we are convinced that our positions are so reasonable that nobody who understands them could possibly continue to be opposed to them. Our basic position is that if we are going to live in a multi-cultural society, based on a politics of identity, then White people need to develop their identity and they need to have representation at all levels of society. Our assumption that no one could possibly argue with such a reasonable position proved true -- about 20 minutes into the discussion, the antis began agreeing with us.

We had a pretty pleasant discussion for roughly another 30 minutes or so, when out of nowhere, a group of about 8-10 communist thugs rushed into the room, wearing face-coverings, and attacked us from behind. One of them had a bicycle u-lock which he began battering people with. He hit three of us with the lock, including a man in his 60's whom he struck in the forehead and knocked-down. He was treated by paramedics. Others among their group grabbed chairs and began swinging and throwing them at us. We remained calm and weathered the storm, never striking back, because we understand that the thugs are backed by powerful Jewish interests and they want us to defend ourselves so they, and their backers, can proclaim to the world that we attacked them and put us in prison. The attack lasted about 2-3 minutes, when all of the thugs ran off.

Bicycle U-Lock

The three Communists that we were talking with, were, of course, not attacked -- showing that they were, in fact, members of the attacking group. However, because they agreed with so much of what we had to say, they actually tried to intervene and stop their comrades from attacking us.

The leader of the PLP, Gordon Davis of Worcester, and his wife, Gwendolyn, came in behind the attackers and started shouting that they had been attacked by us. Yet they were never in the room where the attack took place. They also filed a false police report claiming that they were hit by a chair (again, they were never near the area where their fellow Communists were throwing chairs). They also claimed that they did not know the other attackers -- yet they are the leaders of the group that attacked us.

Gordon and Gwendolyn Davis (She's holding the purplish sign, he's behind and to her left)

The police came and took a report. We identified several of the attackers, including, Daragon Carson (the guy with the bike lock) and Gordon and Gwendolyn Davis from a video the PLP made, back in February, and posted to YouTube. At the time of this report, almost two months later, there have been no arrests.

We are determined to ensure that White rights advocates are allowed to meet in publicly available spaces to organize on behalf of White people without fear of violence from Jew-dominated groups like the PLP and others. Toward that goal we decided that we would continue to meet at the WPL, every month, just like many other racial, ethnic, and identity groups do. We tried to schedule a meeting for June. We were not able to get a time slot until July 16. And then the library reneged. More on that, in part III of this series.

Annual North East White Pride "Close the Border" Demonstration

2011-07-03T15:02:00.008-04:00

Every year around this time, North East White Pride activism heats up along with the weather and you can count on three things: the Stars and Stripes to come out, the fireworks to go off, and the committed men and women of North East White Pride to be standing on the street corners near Liberty Park in Hudson, NH fighting to preserve the rights and culture of White people everywhere.

This year's "Close the Border" demonstration, held yesterday, July 2, was the most successful yet. Almost two dozen White Rights Advocates from as far away as Mystic, CT joined together to celebrate their country's proud past and to fight to ensure a future for their children in a society increasingly bent on destroying White Culture, Heritage, and Way of Life.

In many ways this year wasn't much different from past years, the officers of the Hudson Police Department were professional, the locals were supportive, and the few non-Whites that were around were as aggressive and hateful as always. We did have a slightly larger turn-out than past years and we had our first bit of drama when some teenage Hispanics decided to come over and confront us with their usual racist, obscene rantings. It makes you wonder where their parents are and why they don't teach their children to have respect for adults and the people that built the country they are so desperate to live in.

But all-in-all it was a great success. Of the thousands of cars that passed-by, we received hundreds of beeps and thumbs-up with fewer than a couple dozen negative responses. Of course, all the people supporting us were the hard-working, tax-paying, law-abiding White residents of the area, while the people against us were almost all Hispanic or belonged to some other Privileged Identity Group with a long-standing (and irrational) hatred of Whites.

If you were unable to make it, we hope to see you next year.

The Art of Suppression

2011-02-23T17:12:00.046-05:00

White Americans are growing aware that something is very wrong in their country. They are slowly awakening to the fact that they have been robbed of their traditions, their past has been perverted, their culture and way of life is being destroyed, and that they, increasingly, are being denied basic rights and freedoms that are supposed to be protected by the US Constitution. Of these the freedom of speech - for White people - is being encroached upon daily. Yesterday, I had mine delayed.

I belong to a White rights advocacy group, North East White Pride (NEWP), that holds regular meetings around New England. NEWP is a staunch advocate of freedom of speech and we encourage dispossessed Whites to come and meet with us to discuss issues of concern to them and their possible solutions. Attendance is generally 5-25 people.

We have been meeting at the Worcester, MA public library since November, without incident, even given that the patrons of the library are almost completely non-White. In fact, the only Whites I have seen there are members of our group and library staff. This is the primary reason we chose Worcester as a meeting place - many White residents have visited our website and lodged complaints that the city they grew-up in, has become alien and hostile to them and that local authorities show no concern for their rights, traditions, and heritage.

When we originally decided to host meetings at the library we contacted the library staff to ascertain their position. We explained to them that we were a White advocacy group and they assured us that because the library was a publicly funded institution, our group had as much right as any other, to reserve one of their conference rooms. Yesterday was the first time, in four months of meeting there that we have had any problem.

At approximately 7pm on Monday night somebody named, Jared Going, posted a message to the forum of a powerful, well-funded, anti-White hate group known as One People's Project. Like many of these groups they masquerade as a "civil rights" organization and cloak themselves in a mantle of "concern," but in fact, they are virulently hostile to the interests of Whites and always seek to thwart any discussion of the issues that concern Whites, particularly of those issues of concern to heterosexual, White men of the working and middle classes. The message announced that we were holding a meeting at the library and that forum members should inundate the offices of the city manager and head librarian with calls and emails threatening "problems" if we are allowed to meet. (He has since added to the original post and it is increasingly clear that this group is eager to use violence to silence our voices. Hopefully, local law enforcement and the FBI [because this group is from out of state] will investigate.)

At 1:30pm the next afternoon I received a call from the head librarian, Mark Contois, in which he read me an email he had received from the city manager asking us to please reschedule the meeting because of "security concerns" of the city manager and chief of police. Their stated reason for concern was that a black pride group was meeting across the hall in another conference room. I said, that our discussion group certainly wasn't violent and asked if he felt their group was. He said he didn't believe so, but would I please consider rescheduling. As an act of good faith, I agreed to reschedule. (I should note that he also said that he was not asking them to reschedule, because they had reserved their room first. Fair enough.)

I have confidence that Mr. Contois, the city manager, and the police chief are acting in good faith, but I also know that the bigots at One People's Project and their powerful backers are going to make it very difficult for them to honor their oath to uphold the constitution. I'm not writing this entry to complain, but rather to illustrate how hard-left idealogues operate and to show that their operation would be impossible without funding and cooperation from immensely powerful vested interests in government, finance, media, and non-governmental organizations, like local synagogues.

Just prior to Mr. Contois's call I received the first of many from the local media. A reporter, Jackie Ries, with the Worcester Telegram, wanted to know if our meeting was connected to the local kidnapping, robbery, beating and racial humiliation of a young White kid by a 35 year old black bouncer that was currently making the rounds on Youtube. I told her I didn't know anything about that story and that our meeting had been scheduled weeks before. She asked a few more questions and hung-up. It was clear from her tone and attitude that she has a real problem with heterosexual, white men and nothing but contempt for the issues that concern them. This fact was borne-out by the mendacious article the Telegram published a few hours later - which not only got basic facts wrong (e.g. she [intentionally?] misidentifies the group as North East White Power) but completely misrepresented my statements. This is a common tactic of the mainstream media when reporting on issues of race, especially of partisan Jewish "reporters" like Ms. Reis. They believe that by smearing White advocates with the false label of "hater" they are justified in silencing our speech. We certainly are not "haters" and even if we were our speech is protected under the first amendment and our right to meet without the threat of violence is guaranteed by the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment.

A few hours after my talk with Mr. Contois, I received a call from someone identifying himself as, Rabbi Matt Berger of a local synagogue who said he was calling because "some of his congregants were concerned." I quickly assured him that his congregants had no cause for concern and that he and his congregants were more than welcome to attend our rescheduled meeting. I further assured him that we were eager to initiate a dialogue with the local Jewish community and to hear their ideas on how best to approach the problem of Jewish power and the devastation it was causing not only in White nations but in non-White nations like Palestine. He said he "did not want to dialogue" with me and ended the call.

As I said, within 5 hours of the start of the business day I received a call from the head librarian, asking me at the behest of the city manager to reschedule our meeting. Within a few hours of that I received multiple calls from the media and a local rabbi. How does the posting of some goofy, left-wing, (probably) drug-abusing college kid turn into a full-court press involving media, synagogues, and local public officials?

It couldn't happen without backing from the most powerful interests in our country. Who are these people? What is their aim? Why are they so determined to stop half-a-dozen Whites from talking about interests of concern to them in a public meeting place?

This is the real story that Ms. Reis and her cohorts should be reporting. Why isn't the media reporting on these thugs that are attempting to intimidate hard-working, tax-paying White Americans? Why aren't they investigating who their financial supporters and top organizers are? Why isn't law enforcement? After all, threatening violence is a crime and groups like One People's Project are clearly hate groups engaged in domestic terrorism. The final question is when are White people going to stand up to this abuse and hold our public officials accountable for allowing these violent hate groups to operate unchecked?

(Editor's note: This group, in tandem with the black mayor pro tem of Charlotte, NC was also responsible for forcing the cancellation of another event, the American Renaissance Conference, attended by White rights advocates, meeting in that city two weeks ago. This is a crime that they have been committing - and getting away with, aided and abetted as they are by the powers-that-be - all over the country for years.)

25 Myths About Race and "Racism": Myth #6

2010-10-04T21:44:00.002-04:00

Myth #6: America Owes Reparations to Blacks in America

Like the “Whites Are Guilty of Slavery” myth, this myth has long been a fantasy of radical racist elements in the black community and their globalist supporters. Also like that myth, a dispassionate examination of the facts, shows that America owes blacks nothing, in fact, blacks owe America. As already established, Africans are responsible for enslaving blacks and Jewish slave traders are largely responsible for transporting them to American, so why would America owe them reparations?

Slavery in America was largely beneficial to Africans. Contrary to the Hollywood “whips-on-tortured-backs” version of slavery, in the American south, blacks were treated very much like members of the family by their White slave owners. In 1936, Franklin Roosevelt's administration collected as many of the surviving slaves as they could find, in order to record their memories for posterity. Of the over 2000 former slaves that were found, none claimed to have ever been whipped and the majority of them proclaimed that their lives, as slaves, were easier and more congenial to them than the lives they lived after having been freed. Further, their descendants now get the benefit of living in the most prosperous country on earth.

Not to mention, since their emancipation the black community has been the recipient of over one trillion dollars, through dozens of social welfare programs, from White America.

Almost as many Whites died in the Civil War, which resulted in the emancipation of blacks (600,000), than the total number of blacks that were brought to America in bondage. If anything was owed blacks, it was paid – in-full – by the end of the Civil War.

Why should Americans as a group, have to pay for slavery, when the overwhelming majority of Americans today (White and black) are descended of people, who either immigrated to these shores after the Civil War had ended, or are recent immigrants to this country themselves?

Finally, blacks beat, rob, rape, and kill hundreds of thousands of Whites every year, including raping roughly 40,000 White women and killing about 4,500 Whites, per year. In the nearly century-and-a-half since blacks were freed they have raped and/or killed more than twice the number of Whites, than the total number of blacks brought to America in the Middle Passage Slave Trade. Clearly, if reparations are owed, it is something blacks owe to America.

25 Myths About Race and "Racism": Myth #5

2010-09-30T21:27:00.005-04:00

Myth #5: Racial Profiling Is the Reason for Non-Whites' Higher Crime Rate

This old canard claims that "racial profiling" is the reason that non-Whites are overwhelmingly over-represented as the perpetrators of crimes in the FBI's Uniform Crime Report and National Crime Victimization Survey. Profiling is a useful law enforcement tool that accounts for no more than 1-3% of all the arrests and convictions of criminals nationwide. If these incidents were expunged from the public record the non-White population would still commit crimes at a rate exponentially greater than the rate at which Whites commit crimes. The vast majority of criminals are caught and convicted after a police report is filed and an investigation is done. No profiling is involved. Non-Whites are over-represented in the prison population for one reason only - they commit significantly more crimes than do Whites.

25 Myths About Race and "Racism": Myth #4

2010-09-29T21:07:00.002-04:00

Myth #4: Non-Whites Are Penalized More Harshly by the Justice System for the Same Crimes

To the contrary, most evidence points to the fact that Whites are held to a much higher standard regarding crime than any other group. Crime is so rampant in some non-White communities that “minor” infractions, like the possession of small amounts of drugs or possession of unregistered firearms, without a license, are routinely over-looked by law enforcement. “Crimes” that are routinely enforced in majority-White communities, like traffic violations and jay-walking, are unheard of in America's inner-cities. Entire categories of crimes, like “hate” crimes are selectively enforced, almost solely, against Whites, even though Whites are much more likely to be the victims of such crimes than the perpetrators of them. Jury nullification is so rampant in non-White communities (see the O.J. Simpson and Reginald Denny cases) that it is virtually impossible for prosecutors to gain a conviction against non-Whites if their victim is White. The recent dismissal of a case involving Black Panthers, caught on video engaging in voter intimidation, vividly demonstrates the unequal enforcement of the laws. The White population, of entire states, is under a form of consent degree (the Voting Rights Act) forcing them to divulge to the federal government any changes to their voting practices, in order to prevent them from “intimidating” non-White voters. And finally, perhaps the most egregious area, where Whites are discriminated against by the criminal justice system, is in the area of immigration. While non-Whites, from every nation on earth, are flooding into our nation in violation of our immigration law, it is only White Europeans that are routinely rounded-up and sent back to their countries of origin for simple violations like missing a check-in or overstaying their visas.

25 Myths About Race and "Racism": Myth #3

2010-09-28T20:22:00.006-04:00

Myth #3: Whites Have Some Special Kind of "Skin Privilege"

This is another of the rare race myths that can be traced back to its originator. The accusation, that Whites benefit from some form of “skin privilege,” was first made by Noel Ignatiev, a former Harvard University staff member, and has now gained favor, under the rubric of “Whiteness Studies,” on college campuses nationwide. On its face, the idea is preposterous, Whites (particularly White men) are the most discriminated against group in America. Whites are not awarded extra points for their racial identity in college admissions. There are no set-asides for Whites in government hiring and contracting. Whites are disproportionately charged with so-called “hate crimes” (while at the same time being disproportionately victimized by such crimes). Whites are not allowed to advocate on behalf of their group's collective interests, without being labeled “racist” (a word coined by Communist agitator Leon Trotsky), there are no White lobbies in Washington DC looking after the interests of European-Americans, Whites are the only group that it is acceptable to accuse of racism, and they are disproportionately sued - and found at fault - for racial harassment. And this only touches on the most common forms of institutionalized anti-White sentiment. Anti-White racism practiced by non-Whites is even more prevalent. Whites are overwhelmingly the targets and victims of violent inter-racial crime. Whites are an order of magnitude or more, more likely to be beaten, robbed, raped, or killed by a non-White than they are to be the perpetrator of such a crime against a non-White. In addition, White countries, communities, and families are being overrun by non-Whites, which in turn has the genocidal affect of robbing Whites of their traditions, denigrating their heritage, confusing the facts concerning their history, and destroying their culture and way of life.

25 Myths About Race and "Racism": Myth #2

2010-09-27T21:07:00.001-04:00

Myth #2 - Whites Are Guilty of Slavery and Must Be Held Accountable

Slavery is an ancient custom, traditionally practiced by all peoples. The most enslaved people in history have been White people. In fact, the word “slave” comes from the practice of ancient Near Easterners capturing and enslaving “Slavs,” a White, European people. This White slave trade continues to this day. White Europeans themselves have a very brief slave-trading history. Although slaves were traded among the tribes of Europe, the practice was limited in scope. The idea that Whites are the most “guilty” of slavery is based on claims made about the “Middle Passage Slave Trade,” involving Africans being brought to the Americas. This practice was, in historical terms, very brief. Although it began in the 16th century, it didn't become common until the early part of the 18th century and was ended in 1808. The numbers of Africans brought to what is now the United States is estimated to have been less than 650,000. This number pales in comparison to the number of blacks enslaved by their fellow Africans during this period and is only a tiny fraction of the 10's of millions of Whites enslaved by Jews, Turks, Africans, and others throughout history. Further, almost every slave brought here was enslaved by another African and transported here in a Jewish-owned ship. If slavery is the greatest evil - and those that have practiced it are guilty and deserving of punishment - then we should be examining how best to bring to justice the blacks, Jews, Arabs, and Turks, who are responsible for the bulk of enslaving and slave-trading.

25 Myths About Race and "Racism"

2010-09-26T21:13:00.011-04:00

I'm working on a project to debunk the 25 most repeated myths about race and "racism." I've found that projects like this often benefit from multiple view-points, so I'm going to post one myth a day - until the list is complete - in the hopes that you will offer your suggestions, recommendations, and criticisms.

Myth #1: Race Is a Social Construct

Race is a biological fact that goes much more than skin deep. For almost a century physical anthropologists have been able to identify the race of an individual's remains by a cursory examination of his or her bones. Because of the vast differences among the races, modern medical science is increasingly focusing on the race of the patient. The Human Genome Project has clearly identified three races of humans (that correlate directly to those long identified by physical anthropology): Caucasian (Europeans, Middle Easterners, and North Africans), Negro (Sub-Saharan Africans), and Mongoloid (Asians and American Indians). The myth that “race is a social construct” is one of the few that can be traced back to an actual individual. It was created by Frans Boas, who forked anthropology by creating a branch of it known as “cultural” anthropology, in order to advance the idea that race is not a biological fact and only a “social construct.”

One Random Act of Whiteness

2010-02-19T19:25:00.023-05:00

Recently one of the Connecticut members of a regional White Rights group, North East White Pride (NEWP), I'm also a member of, posted an inspirational story to the group's web forum. This story is so typical of members of the group that I thought I'd share it with my readers to give them an insight into the "mentality" of the folks involved in White Rights and Advocacy. Here it is (slightly edited for clarity):

(Posted to the NEWP forum on Feb. 17, 2010)

So I am on vacation right now. I decided to run some errands in my hometown. Check the po box and stuff. Off of the highway overpass I saw a guy standing on the sidewalk with a cardboard sign in his hand. I got off of the highway and pulled in to the Dunkin Donuts where he was at. I read the sign. Him and his wife and 4 kids were homeless and he was asking for any help. . . . so I went over and talked to him and introduced myself. He was happy just for the fact that I came and talked to him. I talked to him about his story and to make sure he wasnt some crackhead. He was legit. He was telling me how ashamed he was standing there but he had to make money to provide and keep them in a cheesy nasty hotel room to stay warm.

He shook my hand and thanked me for talking to him. He asked what my "88" pin meant and I told him the truth and he said that was awesome of me to take the time to chat. And we talked about illegals taking our jobs. I went to my truck and gave him a pair of gloves to wear because it was cold. I went and bought him a coffee and bacon egg and cheese from the Dunkin Donuts and a gift card to get coffee or what not. I gave him $5 and a pack of cigs. I stood with him for over an hour. He kept saying thank you so much and that he couldnt believe that someone would actually help out like this. I told him this is what we do. He wanted my phone number for when he gets back on his feet. he said he wouldnt forget this help. I told him not to worry.

So....a cop drives by. But...he already talked to a cop earlier who said he could stand there as long as he didnt cause a disturbance. Well this is before I was standing there with him. I guess the world is a different place for people when Tyrant is around. The cop spun back around and came flying in the parking lot. She got out of the car and asked for our I.D.s and what we were doing there and what the sign said. We gave our I.D.'s and she was asking if we knew each other. The guy said no...this nice guy bought me coffee and a sandwich and is talking to me about my situation. Well here comes cop car #2 with two officers in it. The cop car drives towards me and drives right in to my leg. I hit the hood slightly and bounced off the cruiser. The cop held his hands up and went whoops. I'm fuming at this point. They put us both on the hood and search us. They asked me if I had a bomb on me lol. like seriously?

My I.D. would not return to me for another 30 minutes. They were TRYING to find something. So the car that hit me had a black and puerto rican cop in it. I had my flight jacket on with all my pins. The p.r. [Puerto Rican] cop says oh someone in the Hitler movement? I said "yep something like that" He said amen to that brother. Then he started asking me about all my pins like he didnt know. But i have no shame in anything so i explained my pins and where i come from. These cops already know who i am. Cop car #3 arrives with 2 more cops in it. The p.r. cop says someone here is a celebrity and they all looked at me. They started asking about CT Hate groups and I gave them a run around. The black/jamaican cop said i was an 'angel'. apparently hes religious and believes i was the homeless guys angel. he said racist or not he respects the fact that i took the time and went out of my way to help someone in need in the bad economy and said he doesnt blame the guy for standing there trying to make money for his family.

So bottom line is a half hour later I got my i.d. back and it was clean of course. They told the guy he had to go because he was soliciting. The cops offered him a ride to the hotel. And the jamaican cop said no he has an angel here. He said lets go and that I would take care of him. Weird and f@@Ked up s@@t huh? I took the guy back to the hotel and gave him a NEWP card and said to contact us when hes back on his feet. He said after meeting me and seeing how WN are...that he will do anything to help out.

Editors Note: Many people have offered donations of food, clothing, and money to help the young father featured in this story. If you'd like to help please contact Aryan Volk of Midgard, a charitable organization, founded to help White folks, who have been harmed by the negligent/corrupt policies of our government (like out-of-control non-White immigration, endless wars for Israel, and forced integration), get back on their feet.

The 25 Most Important Pro-White Organizations

2010-02-06T15:12:00.022-05:00

As most of my readers are aware, White people are under attack. From demands that we leave countries, over-seas, that we built; to demands that we accept the invasion of hostile non-Whites into our indigenous lands; to intentional changes in our way of life that rob us of our traditions, denigrate our heritage, lie about our past, and destroy our culture; to deliberate changes in our national policies that harm us and favor those that wish to continue to harm us; we are being hounded, attacked, and even "genocided" all over the world.

Fifty years ago, Whites were roughly 33% of the world's population, today we are less than 13% and shrinking. It is estimated that by the end of this century - if current anti-White trends continue - we will constitute less than 3% of the world's population. As globalization increases and the tiny minority of ultra-rich globalists and their collaborators continue to expand their power and impose one-world government on us, we will be a tiny, despised, and oppressed minority without any hope for justice.

We must prevent both the decimation of our population and the impositions of a "one-world government" on our people. The best way to do that is to become informed and get active in the struggle against the globalist agenda. I've compiled a list of organizations that are committed to helping you do just that. Here's a count-down of 25 that I consider to be most important. These organizations run the gamut from political parties, to cultural preservation societies, to educational institutes, to commercial enterprises, to news/entertainment media outlets. Some of them are nascent and not well-developed yet, but that is why it is important for you to get involved and ensure they develop to a point where they can be useful in our struggle against genocide. Visit their websites, learn what they are about, and get involved.

25. Racist-Jokes
What is it?
Just as it sounds, Racist-Jokes is a large collection of racially-oriented jokes. Visitors can not only read, but post jokes to the site.

Why is it important?
It's important because, in this business, we all need a laugh sometimes, plus it can develop into a traffic generating hub, that points those racially unreconstructed enough to enjoy a site of this nature, to other, more important sites.

24. European Americans United (EAU)
What is it?
EAU is a White Rights Advocacy group built around the simple concept that racial preservation is moral. Although racially-aware they are not explicitly Jew-wise.

Why is it important?
This group offers good White people the opportunity to organize and fight for their rights in a world increasingly intent on robbing them of those rights. It also has a news division and an education section. They are developing a home-schooling curriculum that could prove crucial to our people's self-preservation.

23. Original Dissent (OD)
What is it?
OD is an online bulletin-board or forum. It was originally named Texas Dissent and preserves those origins in its "paleo-conservative" outlook. It has gained an international membership of bright, committed, and extremely helpful folks.

Why is it important?
It offers all of the same benefits of other forums, but it's constituency of older, more mature (elder-statesmen?) folks makes it more suitable for newbies than the other more raucous, off-putting forums.

22. Institute for Historical Review (IHR)
What is it?
The IHR is a site devoted to accurate historical research, with a focus on events of the early to middle part of the last century.

Why is it important?
Simple - it exposes the myths, inaccuracies, and outright lies of those that won WWII and therefore were able to (re-)write history.

21. David Duke Report
What is it?
The David Duke Report is an alternative news site.

Why is it important?
Dr. Duke and crew do a great job of presenting original investigative reports and explaining the events of the day from the correct perspective, rather than with the usual biases of the Jewish-controlled "Mainstream Media."

20. Council of Conservative Citizens (CofCC)
What is it?
Like European Americans United above, the CofCC is a national organization dedicated to the preservation of White cultural achievements and the advancement of our interests. It is older and more experienced than EAU, which is why I ranked it higher on the list. It also differs from EAU in that it is explicitly Christian. EAU has no religious association.

Why is it important?
It's a place where racially-responsible White people can get active in preserving a future for their children.

19. Local 1488
What is it?
Local 1488 is an online shop owned and operated by good White people.

Why is it important?
Every purchase you make goes to the good White owners and they spend it in a racially-responsible way, including supporting other sites they run like Racist-Jokes above and North East White Pride, a local activist organization in New England. If Whites are to make any inroads into the depredations against us, we must develop a market-place that is outside of the control of the Jews and their collaborators. Local 1488 is a good first step toward that goal.

18. CasteFootball
What is it?
A sports news and analysis site.

Why is it important?
It exposes the blatant anti-White biases present in the Jew-controlled sports of football, soccer, basketball, baseball, boxing, and more. If you like sports, you'll love CasteFootball. It, and its complementary forum, are the best sources for sports-related news on the web.

17. Resisting Defamation
What is it?
Its purpose is to fight against the campaign of defamation so frequently expressed against the diverse white American peoples by media, films, government officials, college professors, and texts.

Why is it important?
Those that would destroy us, believe that power is essentially the ability to define, valorize, and label. They use this power to induce, what they call, "cultural pessimism in White males." In other words, they use it to rob White men of our confidence, so that we will meekly accept subjugation and ultimately our destruction. Bo Sears has created a portal where you can learn not only about their tactics and strategies, but how you can resist them.

16. U.S. National Militia Directory (USNMD)
What is it?
Just as it says. A directory of constitutional militias.

Why is it important?
Every able-bodied White man between the ages of 17 and 45 is a member of the Militia by law. You should exercise this right. The USNMD helps you find a Militia in your area.

15. Gun Owners of America (GOA)
What is it?
GOA is the nation's premier gun-rights advocacy group. Its leader, Larry Pratt, has proven his racial loyalty, repeatedly, in the past by speaking to explicitly pro-White groups.

Why is it important?
That other gun-rights group is suspect in some of its dealings. Mr. Pratt and company won't disappoint.

14. Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust (CODOH)
What is it?
Like the IHR above CODOH maintains an extensive library of works related to the "Holocaust."

Why is it important?
It is a well-designed, organized, and run site that is committed to exposing the truth about the so-called "holocaust."

13. American 3rd Position (A3P)
What is it?
An explicitly pro-White political party.

Why is it important?
Both "mainstream" parties are openly hostile to the interests of White people. The A3P is a necessary ingredient of the recipe to restore the rights of White people and advance our interests.

12. Metapedia
What is it?
A user-editable online encyclopedia.

Why is it important?
Access to reliable information is central to freedom. Unlike that other online encyclopedia (Wikipedia) it was not founded by a Jewish pornographer and therefore lacks all of the usual biases one would expect from such origins.

11. Eurspace
What is it?
A social networking site explicitly for White people. (As of this writing the site was down, due to the fact that it was being upgraded.)

Why is it important?
All other people have sites devoted to them. Whites need areas that are off-limits to non-Whites so that we can rest, relax, recreate, and network, without their corrupting influences.

10. ANU News
What is it?
A news aggregation site.

Why is it important?
ANU News collects the most important news of the day, from the most trustworthy sources, and presents it to the public. If the right of the people to comment on the news is infringed by the source then that source can't be trusted. ANU News allows its readers to comment without uncalled for moderation or registration procedures.

9. Voice of Reason Radio Network (VoR)
What is it?
A pro-White radio network online. A source of, as prominent program host, Dr. Tom Sunic, likes to say, "staggering erudition."

Why is it important?
This should be self-explanatory. News by, for, and about White people and their interests is an imperative if we are to maintain viability.

8. National Policy Institute (NPI)
What is it?
The first (and only, as of this writing) pro-White think tank/policy institute.

Why is it important?
We need quality research, ideas, and writings presented to the public at-large as well as to those in power. NPI provides it.

7. Aryan Volk of Midgard (AVM)
What is it?
AVM is a national charity with a focus on helping good White folks who have been harmed by the disruptions to our society caused by our nation's treacherous leadership and the policies like Affirmative Action, Open Borders, and endless wars for Israel that they've imposed on us. The linked site is he forum for the charity.

Why is it important?
As the saying goes, "charity starts at home." Whites are the most benevolent, charitable people on earth, we need to start directing that charity toward our own and stop benefiting those that despise us. AVM will help you do just that.

6. The Occidental Quarterly (TOQ) & The Occidental Observer (TOO)
What is it?
The Occidental Quarterly is (as it's title would suggest) a quarterly publication that addresses the ongoing denigration and displacement of the diverse European peoples. The Occidental Observer is its online companion site (although TOQ is published online now, as well).

Why is it important?
They reclaim and rehabilitate lost events and personalities from our rich history, restore our cultural artefacts, and give us the tools necessary to retake our societies from the hostile aliens that currently rule over us. They are the most informative and reliable sources of written information for White people.

5. The Political Cesspool
What is it?
The Political Cesspool is a no-holds barred, weekly, 3-hour radio program broadcast nationally and online every Saturday night that pulls no punches concerning the elements that harm White society.

Why is it important?
It gives you the information necessary to make informed decisions about your future.

4. American Dissident Voices
What is it?
A series of radio broadcasts, by Dr. William L. Pierce and his associates dating primarly from the 1990's and early double-aughts. The shows broadcast prior to Dr. Pierce's passing in July of 2002 are of particular interest.

Why is it important?
Dr. Pierce examines and identifies the causes of White cultural and racial decline and gives a penetrating assessment of those who, in his opinion, bear primary responsibility - the Jews and their allies. His focus is on how they use the media to destroy us and on what we can do to counteract their control of our media.

3. Culture Wars
What is it?
Culture Wars is a website by Catholic traditionalist scholar, E. Michael Jones. Dedicated to exposing the ongoing and clandestine Jewish war on Christianity, particularly as it applies to Catholicism. He is non-racialist and, in fact, often expresses disdain for racial-consciousness. This makes his site no less compelling, or perhaps even moreso, because despite its racial neutrality it identifies the Jews as the primary culprits of the destruction of Western Civilization.

Why is it important?
The site's primary importance are two books that it sells. Libido Dominandi and The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit. The former exposes how the Jews use sexuality to subjugate the masses and the latter is Jones's Magnum Opus it is a master-work exposing the Jewish root of every movement - from Marxism, to multi-culturalism, to feminism - detrimental to Western Society.

2. Kevin MacDonald
What is it?
Dr. Kevin MacDonald's personal website containing his works examining the psychological underpinning of the Jewish desire to destroy everything White.

Why is it important?
Professor MacDonald's works are an imperative for any one trying to understand why Jews behave as they do and what we might do to protect ourselves from their continuing depredations.

1. Stormfront
What is it?
Put simply, as the oldest, biggest, most trafficked online forum in the world it is the center of mass of the pro-White movement.

Why is it important?
If you want to get involved in pro-White activism this should be your first stop. There are sections where you can learn the rudiments of White identity, get the scoop on breaking news stories, by civilians on the scene with their cellphones and Blackberries all long before the MSM drones are even aware that a story has broken, and places where you can learn to bake a peach cobbler, or grow a vegetable garden. When you're ready you can even find people in your own area to get involved with.

Hiatus Status

2010-01-01T20:04:00.002-05:00

As many of you have probably noticed I haven't published an entry in a while. I've been very busy with work and other commitments and hope to get back to posting regularly in a few months (maybe March).

Till then, I wish everyone a Happy New Year.

Russ

Appearing on The Political Cesspool Radio Program

2009-08-21T12:44:00.004-04:00

I'm going to be appearing on the Political Cesspool radio program to discuss the events of last Saturday's counter-demonstration against the Illegal Invasion, coordinated by North East White Pride, New England's leading White rights and advocacy organization.

Show : The Political Cesspool
Date: Saturday, August 22, 2009
Time: 7-10 pm EDT (I will be on from 8:45-9:00 pm)

Give a listen, if ya can.

Rally in Support of East Haven's Police Department

2009-08-08T03:55:00.008-04:00

North East White Pride (NEWP), New England's premier White rights and advocacy organization, is rallying in support of East Haven, CT's mayor, city council, and police department. These entities continue to bravely enforce the country's immigration law, despite pressure from powerful organized interest groups to force them to stop.

Latino Unity in Action (Unidad Latina en Accion), an illegal advocacy group that advocates illegal activity in the Hispanic community, is attempting to strong-arm the local authorities into not enforcing the law in East Haven. Their tactics have been successful in other Connecticut communities like nearby New Haven, to the detriment of those communities. Several NEWP members have attended E. Haven city council meetings and ascertained the mayor's resolve to stand firm in her commitment to honor her sworn duty and enforce our country's immigration law - and NEWP will stand with her.

For any who wish to join us, the rally will begin at:
12pm Saturday, August 15, 2009 near
687 Main St. in East Haven, Connecticut.
For more information please visit North East White Pride's website.

Jews Preparing to Oust Obama?

2009-07-27T18:07:00.024-04:00

It's said that pattern recognition is a sign of intelligence. So those who are intelligent, will recognize the very particular pattern that the Jewish men (Sumner Redstone, Jeff Bewkes, Robert Iger, Rupert Murdoch, Les Moonves, and Jeff Zucker), who run the six major media conglomerates, which in turn control 90% of America's media outlets, use to manipulate presidential politics.

If a president is able to achieve a second term in office, he is immediately put on notice by our Jewish Media Masters, that they are still in the driver's seat. They control the office of the presidency of a second-term holder by using a steady campaign of derogatory propaganda to limit the president's approval rating, in an effort to demonstrate to him that they are in control and if he thinks that a second and therefore final term in office is going to insulate him from their power, he is wrong.

With Nixon they used Watergate; Reagan, Iran-Contra; Clinton, Monica Lewinsky; and Bush the Iraq War to maintain a steady barrage of negative publicity against each so that he would be aware that he still had to do as he was told.

Most politicians understand that the Jewish Media-Money Matrix is the real power in Washington and that if they want to advance or even continue in their chosen professions they had better acclimate themselves to it. But many of them believe that if they can get a second term as president - because this signals the end of their careers and they will no longer be beholden to the media for positive press - they will be able to implement the policies they truly want to implement. A barrage of negative media attention by their Jewish masters, in a president's second term, is the means by which those masters demonstrate that they still hold the whip.

Those odd cases, in which a politician is able to reach the apex of his chosen profession and sit in the Oval Office without an understanding of Jewish Power, are always one term presidents. Jimmy Carter is the perfect example. He locked the Prime Minister of Israel, Menachem Begin, and the leader of the PLO, Yasser Arafat, in a room and forced them to negotiate a peace accord at Camp David in 1978. Foolish move. Begin was so incensed that Carter was ousted from office in 1980.

Is Barack Obama the next Jimmy Carter? Both men, by all accounts, have high IQs. Both have a bit of the messiah complex about them. And both seem to be completely oblivious of the fact that the Jews determine their fate.

Because of the tremendous power, their control of our media gives them, the Jewish puppet masters of our politicians can pick and choose which stories to highlight and which to bury, as well as, what value to assign to those stories. With Carter they chose to highlight the hostage crisis in Iran to the exclusion of almost all other stories and they chose to apply the value that the crisis was due to Carter's incompetence, thus ending Carter's career and ushering in the Reagan Era.

It seems the old dogs are up to their old tricks. They appear to be intent on using Obama's lack of citizenship as a lever to force his hand. As a former Muslim and a man with a very powerful black racist identity, Obama sides with all those he perceives as non-White against all those he sees as White. And he sees the Iranians as non-White and the Israelis as White, so he has sided with the Iranians in their conflict. This has made the extremely powerful Jews very angry and they are going to use the birth certificate issue to get Obama to do their bidding against Iran. If he doesn't, he will be out of office.

The only question is, will they wait for the next election cycle or not? I think not. They are already beginning to lay the groundwork for impeachment proceedings against him. They recently allowed Lou Dobbs to discuss his lack of citizenship on national radio and a Jewish kiosk owner is making national headlines for selling "Impeach Obama" stickers in a mall in North Carolina. Further, Israeli news sources are reporting that Israeli Jews are organizing anti-Obama rallies. They forced him to choose Biden as a running mate precisely because of this scenario. Biden has publicly declared himself an ardent Zionist. If Obama doesn't deal with Iran, Biden will be put in the Oval Office to do so.

Of course, the Jewish Controlled Media (JCM) will do as they always do and look for the magnification effect. In other words, they will look to see what other hay they can make from the scandal and rest assured after they oust Obama they'll find a way to blame "White Racism" for his removal.

Be intelligent, recognize the patterns.

On the Existence and Nature of God

2009-07-24T17:56:00.021-04:00

Recently, a column by Pat Buchanan, occasioned a mini-storm in that elite sector of the blogosphere where the best thinking is done. In his piece, "Making a Monkey out of Darwin," Buchanan presented a case for declaring "Darwinism" obsolete. Noted evolutionary psychologist, Kevin MacDonald, offered a retort, showing the reasoning buttressing Buchanan's claim to be defective. Others, like the team over at SpiritWaterBlood.com also weighed in on the matter. Great minds all, they never-the-less fall into the dual trap of conflating theology (the study or theory of God) with religion (the practice founded on a given theology) and acquiescing to the false idea that evolution and biblical creation are mutually exclusive.

Let's extricate the various components of this long-running argument. The first question we must ask is, "Does God exist?" If we accept the notion, drawn from the biblical quote that ". . . God created man in his own image" (Genesis 1:27) of an anthropomorphic God in the sky, who created us and deeply cares for us, then we are going to have a hard time proving his existence. But if instead, we define God as something that is known to exist, then we have just proved the existence of God.

Anselm of Canterbury once defined God as "that than which nothing greater can be conceived." Had he left out the word, "conceived," he would have been correct. The true definition of God is: "That which nothing greater can be." In other words, God is the greatest thing. Surpassing the need to define the word "great" one can simply show that, because no one part of a thing can be greater than the whole, God must be "Everything," or God must be the cosmos. This concept of God can also be found in the bible when it is revealed to John that God is, ". . . the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End" (NIV Revelation 22:13).

We can conclude that God must be the cosmos from the properties of God as well. It is generally accepted that God has three inter-related and essential properties - He (if God is the Cosmos, "He" is the wrong pronoun - "It" would be more accurate, but force of habit and tradition preclude me from using the latter) is all-powerful, all-knowing, and ever-present. Each of these follows from the next. For God to be any of these, He would have to be All-things, or the Cosmos. Because knowledge is power, to be all-powerful He would need to have all-knowledge, thus He would be omniscient. To have all-knowledge He would have to be everywhere all at once, thus He would need be omni-present, in order to be omnipresent He would have to be all things. He couldn't permeate anything to a sufficient level to be omni-present unless He was that thing en toto.

What else can we infer from a God that is the Cosmos? Cosmologist believe that the cosmos is comprised of two elements - space and time. It's further understood that these two things are so closely related and that the correct term for them isn't "space and time" but rather, "space-time."

There are two essential forces in the cosmos the "resolute" force that creates and the "dissolute" force that destroys. In combination these are God. Space is the domain of the resolute force. It is within the realm of space that the Cosmos/God using the trinity of fundamental ingredients - matter (the Father), energy (the Holy Spirit), and consciousness (the Word or the Son) combine to create all that is. Time is, of course, the dissolute force or the destroyer. In colloquial speech, we often say, "an idle mind is the devil's workshop." And, of course, in time all things are leveled or destroyed. The Greek word for time is Chronos. The Romans used Saturn, a corruption of this term, Satan, would eventually come to represent the destructive force for Christians.

Evolution, of which Darwinism or Biological Evolution is a sub-segment, is the process through which the Cosmos/God creates or put more accurately is created, because the creation of God - or that which God creates - is literally the creation of God - or God creating or becoming God. Nihilists believe in the non-teleological or never-ending process of becoming and if the resolute and dissolute forces are equal then they are correct, however, if the resolute force is stronger, then the Cosmos will ultimately resolve perfectly. This perfection would by definition exist outside of time and would account for the understanding of god that allows for such a thing as "free will." Evolution is simply God creating or becoming God.

The biblical account of a six day creative process oddly parallels the creation sequence anticipated by cosmologists. Genesis reports that God created the universe through divine logos or He literally "spoke" it into being. Cosmology believes the universe was initiated by a Big Bang. Curiously, they equate the moment of creation to a sound. If God were to speak everything into being, what would those words sound like? I assume they'd sound very much like a BIG BANG. The first thing He creates, according to the biblical account, is light. Cosmologists also believe that the Big Bang resulted in the instantaneous flooding of the universe with luminescent gaseous particles. In other words the universe was entirely lighted, or restated, the big bang created light.

The next thing to occur, in the Genesis account, is a separation of light from darkness. Science believes the formation of the stars and planets occurred due to gravity forcing the gaseous light particles to clump together, or from the separation of lighted matter from the dark vacuum of space. If you are standing on one of these "clumps," say earth, the rest of them, combined with space, constitute the firmament.

On the third day of the biblical story, the earth is shaped. From the point of view of a cosmologist this is consistent with what they think occurred. Earth was not the first of the objects that came to be from the "clumping" process of gravity, it developed later.

Then The Bible tells us that plant life was created followed by a setting of the lights (the sun and moon) in the heavens on the fourth day. Plant life certainly did come before the rest of life according to evolutionists but the "setting of the lights" is partially inconsistent with the scientific account. Although the moon did come later, as a result of a collision with with earth and another body, the sun came before the earth.

The Genesis version has God creating animal life on the fifth day and Man on the sixth. Both of which are consistent with evolutionary theory. Animals developed after the formation of earth and the flowering of plant life and homo-sapiens, as the most evolved of the animals comes into existence very late in the process.

The biblical creation story is an advanced theoretical but allegorical account of how the universe was created. As allegory it is an almost identical match for how science believes the universe evolved. The disagreement between the two camps - creationist and evolutionist - is both arbitrary and fabricated, and exists solely to enable each group to maintain or garner power, respectively.

Identity Politics - A Primer

2009-07-21T19:36:00.008-04:00

Pat Buchanan wrote in is most recent column, "Why No Evangelical Justice," that:

. . . Republicans were warned not to give Sonia
Sotomayor the drubbing Democrats gave Robert Bork and Sam Alito -- lest they be perceived as sexist and racist by women and Hispanics -- the threat was credible, for it underscored a new reality in American politics.

What he didn't say is that, the reality it underscored has a name.

Liberalism is simply a mechanism whereby Western
Society is divided into different factions called "identity groups" which in turn are used to destroy the society in order to effect totalitarian global governance. This is called "Identity Politics."

The powers-that-be effectively divide our society into nine different "identities." Not all institutions classify in the same way but this division is representative of the whole.

Those identities are:
1. Jews
2. Homosexuals/feminists
3. Rich and upper-middle class White men
4. Asians
5. Lower-middle class and working class White men
6. Women
7. Hispanics
8. Blacks
9. Other

Although technically #5 has been stripped of its identity and is identity-less. I like to call the other identities, Privileged Identity Groups (or PIGs). The top four PIGs act together to form a ruling class with power distributed roughly as listed. In other words, Jews are the most powerful of the top four identity groups and Asians are the least powerful of those four groups.

The bottom four PIGs act as a permanently oppressed class which must be up-lifted in some way. The ruling PIGs define themselves as the protectors, enablers, and empowerers of the bottom four PIGs.

In order to do this they need an enemy, someone whom they can scapegoat as the oppressors. That leaves the one group that has been stripped of its identity - heterosexual, working class, White men.

If you look at this scheme you'll notice that this identity-less group is placed right, smack-dab in the middle.

Class is now defined as described above and White, heterosexual, working class men are now the despised middle class. Hence the phrase "war on the middle class."

Reveries on Ordering-Out

2009-07-19T16:10:00.007-04:00

Earlier this afternoon, while working on a YouTube video project with some of my colleagues from North East White Pride, I got hungry and, because I was too busy to prepare lunch, decided to order out. I called up a local pizza joint and ordered a steak bomb with pickles and mayonnaise. That's where the problem started.

Although I considered myself fortunate, that I didn't have to not "press two for Spanish," my sensibilities were still assaulted by the sequence of events that transpired. There was nothing particularly unusual about the events - they're common enough in this medium-sized suburb of Boston with a population that is 10-15% non-White. They happen to me every time I order out, regardless of which restaurant I order from.

As soon as the foreign-sounding person on the phone answered, he shouted, "pick-up or delivery," in a version of English I could barely comprehend. I answered, "delivery." Because I'm a semi-regular customer, he already had my address and shouted it down the telephone-line for me to confirm. Which I did. He then mumbled the cost, first saying it was ten dollars and some amount of change that was inaudible and then quickly correcting himself by saying it was eight dollars and something (the change amount was again, incomprehensible), and told me it would be "about 30 minutes."

About 15 minutes later there was a knock on my door. I answered it, the delivery person of foreign origin stared at me, vaguely insolently, saying nothing. I asked how much the total was and he stated flatly, "eight dollars." I handed him a ten and told him to keep the change, he grunted and walked away.

This exchange reminded me of Robert Putnam's (Harvard's lead diversity expert) recent study that found that multi-culturalism is a community killer. After a career, spanning 30 years, promoting the propaganda that "diversity is our strength" he finally actually studied the matter and found - what those of us not living in an ivory tower, already knew - diversity is destroying us. He says his study shows that, "in the presence of diversity, we hunker down", he said. "We act like turtles. The effect of diversity is worse than had been imagined. And it’s not just that we don’t trust people who are not like us. In diverse communities, we don’t trust people who do look like us."

This is just a convoluted way of saying people of different backgrounds, world-views, customs, and traditions do not a community make. Because it seems that all of the restaurants in my area are owned and operated by foreigners, I am reminded of this fact, every time I order out.

Twenty years ago, when this part of north-eastern Massachusetts was 99% White, ordering out was a pleasant experience. You'd call up, banter with the guy on the phone - in most cases you probably knew him or at least one of his relatives - if it was a girl that answered you'd maybe flirt a little, some young kid would deliver the pizza, there'd be a pleasant exchange and you'd have your food, feeling pretty good about the world.

Whether or not it is because of a language barrier, a cultural barrier, or because they are taught by the current lords of diversity to think of themselves as victims and thus believe themselves to have a right, nay a duty, to be disrespectful to White men, ordering from these foreigners is always a disjunctive and enraging experience.

Over the last half-century or so, much has been made of the rise in "mental illnesses" (depression, anxiety, and other "stress" related maladies) that require medical expertise and prescription drugs to treat. The increase, in such "illness," parallels, almost perfectly, the demographic change in this nation over the same period. It's clear that multi-culturalism is, in part, responsible for this surge and that this increased alienation is responsible for the general breakdown of community life in America.

This increased alienation is, in turn, partially responsible for the surge in crime, the number of failed marriages, the amount of teenage pregnancy, promiscuity and sexual perversity, drug abuse (both street and prescription). Much of which exacerbate, the already barely manageable, disjunction caused by "diversity."

These developments should make one thing clear - diversity is our destruction. It's true aim is the death of White America. We must stop the "browning of America" and restore our customs, traditions, and culture or the American Experiment will surely fail. As a result American civilization will collapse and we will all, regardless of cultural origins, suffer the consequences.

Nationalism - The Solution to the Foremost Problem

2009-07-16T15:54:00.018-04:00

Many wonder, if there is a foremost problem, then there must be a solution to it. What is that solution?

The solution to Jewish cultural hegemony is nationalism. Nationalism is the historical idea that states are at their most efficient and the citizens of said states enjoy the best balance of security, freedom, and wealth distribution when the population is based on a common language and culture. Nationalism is closely associated with Republicanism - or the right of the people to rule themselves. Historically, it has been the most common form of statehood. It's opposite is globalism. Globalism is closely associated with empire and is a form of government that is structured to benefit elites. Its causes and effects are always to steal wealth from the people and redistribute it to the elites. It is, by definition, multi-cultural.

A well-run society is the product of an optimum balance between the two competing desires of its population - the individuals' desire to be completely unrestrained, on the one hand, and their counter-balancing desire to be prosperous. Anarchy means no government and, in theory, is the perfect expression of freedom. Anarchy does not exist in nature but the closer a group comes to it the more impoverished they are. The foundation of prosperity lies in order and stability. So people consent to governance in order to create that foundation. But because those in government gain power from being in a position of power they become corrupt and seek more power. The end result of this search for power is total government or "totalitarianism."

Totalitarians then (or sometimes synchronously) seek to extend their power over others. Once they achieve a level of control over a society they use that society to dominate other societies. This leads to imperialism. Which extended to its fullest is world domination. This is the end goal of the Jewish Extremists and their collaborators.

Humans have a series of natural sub-groupings all with needs and desires specific to themselves that often overlap or conflict. The fundamental element of humanity is, obviously, the individual. Individuals form natural groups that extend through the following range:

Family

Clan (Extended Family)

Tribe

Nation

Sub-Race

Race

Humanity

Each of these groups has natural advantages and disadvantages as to whether or not they are suitable for providing the building blocks of talent and energy that is necessary to create the balance that humans desire, without creating a system so large that the individual is incapable of recognizing himself. Historically, families, clans, and tribes have proven too small to provide the critical mass of talent and developed skill-sets to produce the highest level of prosperity. On the other hand, the sub-racial, racial, and species groupings have proven too large and unwieldy, which combined with an associated loss of identity and purpose in the individual, leads to difficulty in creating healthy, well-balanced societies. Only the "Nation" grouping allows for the best balance of talent, skill-sets, and identity that in turn allows for the best balance of governance and freedom.

After America's Founding Fathers attended to the problem of establishing a government for their fledgling federation, they turned to the problem of populating and growing it. They understood the idea of nationalism, expressed above, and were concerned with how to increase the population of the federation. They decided to experiment with the idea of a racial nation based on all of the natural characteristics of a typical ethnic nation (i.e. a common language, religion, political system, legal system, system of weights & measures, etc.). All of the accoutrements of a natural ethnic culture extended to the racial extreme. Toward this end, they passed the Immigration Act of 1790, which made non-White immigration into the Union, illegal. Thus was White Nationalism born. They never intended for this nation to be multi-racial or to have any religion other than Christianity (I do not profess to any religion), for they understood that attempting that would doom it. The experiment teetered and tottered for a while but ultimately proved to be successful. In fact, it got so bad that they had to pass another immigration act in 1924 to limit immigration to the percentages of the various ethnicities that were already present in the country.

As mentioned, nationalist states are monocultural and mono-ethnic so Nationalism equates to Ethnic Nationalism. Because America is a nation of many ethnicities, and those ethnicities tend to coalesce into political groupings that are uber-ethnic, or racial, the normal desire for shared culture, traditions, folkways, and history becomes race based. Racial Nationalism evolved from this desire. All races in America, except Whites - are not only allowed - but encouraged, to form raced-based political organizations. This leaves Whites at a tremendous disadvantage in a society that increasingly founds social policy on racial identity. White Nationalism is an organic movement to counter this disadvantage.

White Nationalist Debate on the Morning Liftoff Show

2009-07-13T17:42:00.011-04:00

As many of you know, I discussed White Nationalism and the issue of White Rights on George Russell's Morning Liftoff show this morning.

Here's a link to the 30 minute interview:

Russell A. James Interview on George Russell's Morning Liftoff

I think it went well, let me know what you think.

The Hudson, NH Rally to Protest Illegal Immigration

2009-07-12T16:31:00.014-04:00

Yesterday, I attended a rally to protest illegal immigration in Hudson, NH. The event was sponsored by North East White Pride, a group organized to spread awareness of the harm that current government policy is causing to White America and to get local people involved in the struggle against the policy-makers who are imposing these policies on us.

I arrived a few minutes early and because my fellows had not arrived, but many counter-protesters already had, I decided to talk to them and see if we could find any common ground. I was hoping we could at least agree that Whites do have a right to speak freely about the issues that concern us. I was pleasantly surprised at the results. With a few exceptions, they were all very friendly and open to the things I was saying.

I first addressed two young people holding a banner. They politely said that they were only there to support friends who had invited them and weren't prepared to talk about the issues. A woman, Vivian McGuire, who identified herself as a Jew, immediately flew into a frenzy at my questions. She ranted incoherently about how Israelis had the right to ethnically cleanse Palestinians (seriously, she said this) from their (the Palestinians) homeland of Palestine, but that Whites had no expectation of having ethnically or racially homogeneous countries or even communities of their own. She ranted some more about how I was a NaziWhoWantedToKillSixMillionJews, until her husband stepped in front of her and told her to calm down and quit acting so irrationally. He further told her that I had been exceedingly polite and amicable and there was no reason for her to continue ranting.

He then turned to me and introduced himself as Kevin. I gave him my name, we shook hands and had a short, very congenial, discussion. We found that we were in agreement on many positions, particularly about the repeated abrogations of our constitutionally protected rights, especially those centering on the first amendment - like the freedom of association that Whites - and Whites only - have been stripped of by the Civil Rights Act. While we were speaking, his wife continued with her irrational behavior and she was joined in this by a women (of indeterminate race), who kept babbling incoherently about her two black children. Several other people, very civilly, added their two-bits and after a while we shook hands and parted amicably. (Although Vivian and the other women followed me, still ranting).

During this conversation, the Amerasian photographer for the Nashua Telegraph, Corey Perrine, was taking photos and as I walked away stopped me to ask questions. While we spoke he related to me briefly, that he was half Korean and half German and that he would not like it if (either) Korea was being flooded by foreigners in the way that America and the other White countries are being destroyed by out-of-control mass immigration.

During our discussion, the Telegraph's journalist, Albert McKeon, assigned to cover the rally, asked if I would grant him an interview. I told him that, in my experience, the corporate media outlets always skew their stories in a manner that is clearly biased against Whites and that if he promised to present my answers as I gave them and not "spin" them I would grant him the interview. He promised to do so. We talked for about five minutes and I gave him the basics of what I perceive to be the foundation of the White Rights movement. During this time he appeared to agree with much of what I was saying. His story was published today, and unfortunately, he misrepresented most of what I had to say.

As I continued toward my group, I stopped to talk to a small group of antis. I conversed with three middle-aged White women, who all clearly had "issues" with men. The gist of the discussion was that women should have he right to choose to do anything they want no matter how destructive to them, men, children, or society in generally and that society should continue to force men to pay for those choices. For example, one of them volunteered that she stood for "a women's right to choose." I asked her if she was equally supportive of a man's right to choose. She looked confused as if the idea that men should have any choices was completely foreign to her. I then clarified my question by asking her if she felt that a man should have a right to a "paper abortion." In other words, since an abortion is basically the right of a women to determine for herself whether or not she is ready to have a child and raise it until the age of 18 (and beyond), then a man should have the same right and be able to get an abortion-in-law which would basically be a legal procedure in which he could divest all interest and responsibility in a child that he felt he was not prepared to care for, for the next 18 years of his life. She, of course, said no she did not support a man's right to choose that option.

Our discussion went on for a while in this vein, until I excused myself and walked over to my companions. Albert Mckeon joined us and interviewed both of my companions and then came over to me and we talked, off the record, about the political situation, in America today, with him agreeing with much of what I had to say. This is why his inaccurate relating of our interview was so disappointing. Eventually, Kevin came over and talked for awhile, saying that he felt maybe he was "standing on the wrong side of the street." In other words, he thought he should be protesting with us and not the antis. He then said he was going to the 7-11 across the way and asked us if we wanted anything. Later he brought back drinks.

Vivian and her crazy friend came over and started insulting us (which we never stooped to at any point), after awhile they realized they were making fools of themselves and they walked away.

At 2:45 pm there were three of us and approximately 15-20 of them. About half the people driving by honked, waved, gave us the thumbs up, or gave us the finger. I would estimate that of those that reacted to us, 80-85% were positive and the rest disagreed. Most of those that were angry were non-White, vulgar, and rude. I did not see the counter-protesters (although they had a much larger presence) get any significant attention - good or bad - with the exception of one fella who identified himself as American Indian and excoriated the young couple holding the banner for flying a flag that was not the Stars and Stripes.

By 4pm the counter-protesters' numbers had dwindled by half and we were still holding strong at three protesters and getting more responses from the passers-by. At 4:30 four more of our number arrived and they (the antis) were down to two, both of whom left about 15 minutes later. My conversations with them seemed to discourage them. I think that years of media indoctrination that all Whites, who believe Whites should have rights in their own countries and be able to speak openly about how they feel regarding the anti-White policies that have been imposed on us, are really neo-Nazi, racists caused them to be expecting a representative of the White Rights movement to be vulgar and threatening and when I turned out to be pleasant and reasonable they decided there was really no reason to be standing on the side of the road protesting us.

Overall the rally was a success and I think showed that there is much concern on the part of Whites regarding the Illegal Invasion of our country. Hopefully we can restore integrity to our southern border and then be able to focus our attention on all of the other problems that "diversity" is causing for White America.

The Freedom Papers

2009-07-07T17:35:00.004-04:00

This past weekend's celebration of our country's independence from imperial tyranny, (the very tyranny that is again, threatening to enslave us - Jewish global banking interests) got me thinking about the founding documents that declared and defined the form of freedom our country would embrace. I like to call these documents "the freedom papers." The freedom papers are that well-known collection of documents; "The Declaration of Independence," "The United States Constitution," and the "Bill of Rights," that form the legal backbone of our federal union.

One reason, the Jewish Supremacists and their collaborators are so easily able to dominate the American people is that so few of the people understand these documents. In fact, few have ever even read them. Because of this, the masters of discourse often present us with "experts," that purport to explain the meaning of our legal code. These "experts" claim some title like, "constitutional scholar," and then proceed to intentionally misinterpret our laws. The number of these "experts" with Jewish names is astounding.

The remedy for this problem is for the average person to gain a better understanding of the freedom papers. Fortunately, one doesn't need to be a "constitutional scholar" to do this. The documents are all very short - the "Bill of Rights" is about 1-1/2 pages long and the longest of the documents, "The Constitution," is only about 15 pages long. A careful reading of all three can be done in about 2-3 hours. Our founding fathers wrote these documents to be understood by the stakeholders of society, so consequently, anybody with an above average IQ can easily read and understand these papers.

I recommend you get started today. Here's some links to the texts:

"The Declaration of Independence"

"The Declaration of Independence" states the case for the justification of going to war against the British Empire. It explains the steps the colonists took in an effort to ameliorate and repair the rupture that they felt had occurred between them and their sovereign, and then explains why they were left with no other option but war.

"The United States Constitution"

"The Constitution" explains the structure of the federal government and defines its powers and responsiblities. For instance, the federal government is limited, in criminal prosecutions, to only three cases: treason, piracy, and counterfeiting. Yet today, the federal government involves itself in all sorts of internal policing of the people, from enforcing draconian, unconstitutional "civil rights" laws to extending protection to women that want to kill their own unborn children. All of which are none of the federal government's business and are forbidden it by the constitution.

It also defines the three branches of the government - executive, legislative, and judicial and defines their structure and assigns their powers.

"The Bill of Rights"

"The Bill of Rights" lists ten rights of the people that the government must, under no circumstances, violate. It guarantees that "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed," yet there are more than 25,000 laws currently on the books, that do infringe on our rights to keep and bear arms.

Reading these documents will enable the reader to have a better grasp of the basic law of this country and give him a better sense of when his rights are being violated. The 2-3 hours it would take to read them could possibly well be the best spent hours of one's life.

For those who want an even more in-depth understanding of the law, The Federalist Papers, and The Anti-Federalist Papers are the source that real legal experts consult. They are longer and more advanced treatises, but are still very accessible to anyone with a modicum of intelligence.

I would also recommend reading your individual state's constitution. They can be accessed here:

list of state constitutions

Once one has finished reading these documents, he can claim to be at least as knowledgeable, on this topic as any of the "experts" one is likely to see on TV.

What Happened to America?

2009-07-05T21:06:00.004-04:00

Yesterday, July 4th, was a day in which many Americans observed the 233rd anniversary of their country's independence. They drove to the lake or seaside, barbecued, drank, watched fireworks, or otherwise celebrated, but few contemplated the meaning of independence. For those that did, several questions presented themselves: What happened to America? What happened to her independence? What happened to the promise of this once great land?

In 1959 America was the envy of the world, a beacon of freedom. It was still rejoicing in its vibrant, post-war economy, its population had exploded due to the "baby boom," and its people were the freest in the world. It was a nation aware, and justifiably proud, of its accomplishments. It produced more than any other nation. It had large stable families in which men and women worked together to raise strong future adults. It had industrial and political leaders that took pride in their social responsibilities. It had the lowest crime rate in the world, with a correspondingly low incarceration rate. It had shining cities that were the jewels of the world. Its infrastructure was second-to-none. It had the best healthcare system, an honest government, low taxes, and a booming economy. Its people were rightly proud of it and loyal to it. What happened in the intervening half century?

Today, America's decaying inner-cities are cesspools of crime and blight. Black-on-White assault, muggings, robberies, home invasions, car jackings, rapes, and murders are the norm. Graffiti and decay are everywhere. Elderly people are afraid to venture out - day or night. The poverty rate is rising even faster than the tax rate that overburdens America's working class. Diseases like tuberculosis, that had once been eradicated, have returned. New diseases like AIDS pop up semi-regularly. Ideas like civic duty, patriotism, and freedom are openly scorned. Its healthcare system is failed and its education system is corrupt - focused on teaching "tolerance" and other socialist ideologies, rather than giving its students an education useful in the real world. Political and financial corruption are rife, its economy is dying. Its good-paying, manufacturing jobs are off-shored and unfettered mass immigration allows hostile, third-world invaders in to take the service jobs that can't be sent overseas. Those invaders are then given social welfare largely unavailable to the average American and taught to resent White America. Ennui and civic indifference grow daily. Attacks on constitutionally protected freedoms are frequent. Increased substance abuse - especially abuse of prescription medications - abounds. The institution of family is ridiculed and subverted. Every kind of sexual deviancy is advanced as normal. Everyone, including children, are encouraged to be as promiscuous as they like. At the same time abortion and birth control are heavily promoted leading to a dangerous decline in our birthrates. White American women are having 1.3 children per each - the replacement level is 2.1. Aggravating this problem is the fact that, increasing numbers of the children White women, are having, are non-White. White America is going extinct. This deplorable fact is frequently lauded by corporate and civic leaders alike. The media barrages us with hypersexual, near-pornographic images of ourselves and invariably portrays White men as weak, foolish, and inferior in every way to women and non-White males. And America is enmeshed in endless wars that in no way preserve or advance our interests.

How has this come about?

The answer, in a word, is "globalism" or the drive toward a one world empire and global governance. We are told that globalism is a natural result of advances in technology and human understanding and that it is desirable. The truth is, it is unnatural, unhealthy, and undesireable, in fact, it is absolutely destructive of freedom. And ultimately it is unsustainable. Our elites know this, but they still impose it on us.

Why?

To answer that we must understand the root cause of the problem. The driving forces behind globalism are Jewish Supremacy, corporate greed; and class, racial, ethnic, religious, and gender antagonisms. All but the first problem are creations and/or exacerbations of Jewish Supremacists.

Every bad idea and every destructive movement of the last 150 years has been founded, designed, organized, and financed by Jews. In the rare cases when it wasn't founded by Jews it was founded by a homosexual, but still organized, promoted, and financed by Jews. For instance:

Communism (Karl Marx)
Psycho-analysis (Sigmund Freud)
Fascism (Leon Trotsky)
Critical Analysis (Theodor Adorno, Walter Benjamin)
Cultural Anthropology (Franz Boas)
Marketing/Media Theory (Edward Bernays)
Liberal Economics (John Maynard Keynes - homosexual)
Homosexuality (Alfred Kinsey - homosexual)
Feminism (too many Jews to name)
The Sexual Revolution (Kinsey again)
The Counter-Culture Revolution (Allen Ginsberg, Abbie Hoffman, Jack Weinberger)
Neo-Conservatism (Leo Strauss, Irving Kristol)
Whiteness Studies (Noel Ignatiev)

were all founded by Jews or homosexuals and were all organized and funded by Jews, as well as being promoted heavily by the Jewish controlled media. The purpose of these movements was to provide the intellectual/philosophical foundation for the incessant attack on White America.

Fascism, marketing/propaganda, liberal economics, and neo-conservatism constitute the foundation of current economic theory taught in universities and business schools across the nation. They also provide the philosophical argument for the "open borders" policy that has led to the off-shoring of our manufacturing base and which is responsible for the out-of-control non-White immigration that is tearing at the fabric of our once largely homogenous, and thus, stable society.

Feminism, the homosexual agenda, and the sexual revolution are largely responsible for the low birthrate of our people that is speeding us toward extinction. Fifty years ago Whites were 33% of the world's population. Today we are 13% and declining rapidly. Estimates are that we will be 2-3% by the end of the century. If we can't get fair and honorable treatment from non-Whites in our own countries where we are still the majority - how do you think we will fare under a global government when we represent less than 3% of the population? Further, the current policies that have led to our demographic decline are defined in Article 2d of UN Resoution 260 as "genocide."

Communism, Cultural Anthropolgy, and Whiteness Studies (as well as some of the above) are the theoretical undrepinnings of the racial, ethnic, and religious hatred directed at European-Americans. This has lead to a rise in fear, uncertainty, and doubt in the White population of the world and constitutes serious mental harm. (This is also defined as genocide under Article 2b of UN Resolution 260.)

Jewish Supremacy is very real and it is the source of all the other problems facing White humanity. Because of this, I borrow a phrase from Henry Ford (who was well aware of the Jewish Problem), and call it "The Foremost Problem."

What can you do?

The good news is that there are simple, practical steps you can implement in your life to mitigate and/or eliminate the destructive influence of Jewish power. Just follow as many of these principles as you care to:

1.) Monitor what you consume. The Jewish Supremacists get a cut of almost everything you buy - from the food you eat, to the clothes you wear, to the car you drive. Try to buy from Whites only (especially racially conscious Whites). Whenever possible try to buy from small mom-and-pops and even better from resale shops. Grow as much of your own food as you can, growing a garden is both healthy and fun. If possible, homeschool your children, the public schools are cesspools of anti-White, misandristic perversion. Private schools are not significantly better. Finally, cut your cable, don't allow the Jewish homosexual propaganda that passes for entertainment into your home. Don't watch TV, go to Jewish (Hollywood) produced movies, or buy their books, newspapers, and magazines.

2.) Behave morally. The Jewish Extremists promote sexual depravity, incuding promiscuity, because they believe it reduces resistance to their domination. They believe they can substitute sexual license for real freedoms. Develop a sense of purpose in life, find a spouse that will enable you to live a long, healthy, productive life with many children to help counter our demographic decline.

3.) Have lots of White babies. (Self explanatory.)

4.) Vote against incumbents. The Jewish radicals control our government through manipulation of public opinion using their control of the media and by buying our politicians. Voting against incumbents takes this powerful weapon away. There is not a single member of the US Congress (other than Ron Paul) who is not owned by the Jews or sufficiently cowed by them as to be rendered impotent in our struggle against them and none of them deserve to be re-elected.

5.) Spread the word. Talk to your family, friends, and associates about what you learn at this website. Don't preach, cajole, or force the issue, but we must stop being afraid of foolish, meaningless words like racist and anti-semite. If we can't find the courage to overcome name-calling, how are we going to preserve a future for our children.